By John Bougearel, author of Riding the Storm Out and Director of Financial and Equity Research for Structural Logic
By all measures, the release of the European bank stress test results on Friday was an Alfred E. Newman day for the U.S. stock market. Emerging bull patterns indicate an initial price target of 1313 for the SP500.
For the first time since the April 2010 high, during the week of July 19, 2010, the SP500 tuned out all possible bearish inputs and went back to doing what it does best: donning its rose-colored glasses and shrugging off all possible bearish inputs. It all began with lawmakers extending unemployment benefits on Tuesday July 20th (made retroactively available for participants whose benefits expired in June and July) through Nov 1999 (this gives all lawmakers a pass through the mid-term elections). That day, the SP500 rallied 2.7% off its intraday lows.
On Wednesday, Bernanke spoke of an ‘unusually uncertain’ economic outlook a day after lawmakers voted to extend unemployment benefits retroactively. The SP500 sold off roughly 2% on Bernanke’s statement. The mkt looked horrible going into Thursday. Then, mirable dictu, on Thursday morning the economic data out of Euro was better than expected. Moreover leaks to the media had been made indicating that the Irish banks would pass the stress tests. Speculating that the European bank stress tests would be a net positive for the stock market, or more accurately, that the stress tests might successfully kick the can into eternity (or at least the next year or so), the SP500 rallied 3% on Thursday from Wednesday’s close.
The European bank stress tests, by another accounting legerdemain (what else), reclassified a majority of the sovereign loans on the bank books as “held to maturity.” By and large, the stress tests were designed as a ‘get out of jail free’ card for the European banks. Should we have expected anything less for the privileged banksters? We had already seen a similar legerdemain when lawmakers repealed FAS statement 157 ~ mark to market accounting for US Banks. When this sleight of hand for the European banks were revealed to market participants on Friday morning, the first thing noted by Bloomberg’s Betty Liu and other market experts is that the European stress tests ‘were not credible.’
But as far as the stock market was concerned, the verdict returned was ‘no haircuts required.’ After reading the verdict, the courtroom was adjourned…‘the half time air was sweet perfume while the sergeants played a marching tune.’ When the bulls returned to take the field, they charged and the SP500 tacked on another 1.7% of value on Friday. All told, the bulls rallied the SP500 5% from its intraweek lows set on Tuesday July 20th.
Let me be perfectly clear: July 20, July 22, and July 23 were game-changers for the SP500. Risk-on is back and its coming with a vengeance. To recap the trump cards:
July 20 ~ UE benefits extended retroactively (this will improve US economic data regarding consumer spending beginning in August, and that is what is important for mkt participants)
July 22 ~ Overnight European economic data came in better than expected (who’d a thunk European data would be the rising tide to lift all boats meme against a backdrop of fiscal austerity and sovereign defaults.)
July 22 ~ Leaks to the media that the Irish Banks would pass the stress tests (one less PIGS to worry about, one less egg to fry)
July 22 ~ Bernanke hints to lawmakers that they should extend Bush’s expiring tax cuts beyond 2010 so as to not throw another anchor out on this oh-so fragile and ‘unusually uncertain’ recovery that will take 5-6 yrs for the economy to ‘converge’ with its potential according to Bernanke’s July 15 and July 22 2010 statements
July 23 ~ Stress tests not credible, but we knew that anyways, didn’t we? The whole point of the exercise was to return a verdict that banks a “get out of jail free” card for all of eternity if possible, leaving aside all the flaws in the ‘held to maturity’ justification.
Here is a look at the play by play action this week on the SP500 15 minute chart.
With their ‘get out of jail free’ card, banks now have the ability to put the risk back on that they had to take off in case of sovereign default during May and June 2010. Banks have only just started to started to put the risk back on the table. Investors and traders can expect the banks will be slow to put risk entirely back onto the table, given the poor July economic data that is expected to be announced at the end of July and August. For all intensive purposes, the US economic data for June indicated a recovery that was pancaking into recessionary territory, so, market participants will want to wait until the contradictory evidence of their baseline “economic recovery story” passes. Once the contradictory July data has passed, the restoration of the UE benefits will help the economic data confirm the baseline ‘slow recovery’ of the force majeure.
All it will take to reawaken the animal spirits of the big banks and to put risk back on is to eliminate the sovereign debt default risks to banks and then to see confirmatory evidence of their baseline scenario that a slow recovery is intact. The sovereign debt default risk hasn’t so much been eliminated as smoothed over by the European bank stress tests ‘held to maturity’ reclassification. The slow recovery story is largely a matter of perception and where you stand. If you a bank with a gov’t guarantee and steep yield curve, things are pretty darn good. If you are standing in the unemployment office, or so thoroughly discouraged that you gave up looking for a job, things are pretty rotten. But the dominant perception, as far as the stock market is concerned is the Wall Street, big banks point of view and not that of Main Street.
The other notable nuances bulls are looking at. (hat tip David Rosenberg’s July 23rd Breakfast with Dave daily missive). The observations are Dave’s but the summary comments below are mine.
- China having success curbing property bubble without bursting it. If you can believe the most recent numbers out of China, they are experiencing the Great Moderation. GDP, IP, CPI, and PPI all slowed while retail sales remained elevated at 18%.
- Earnings aren’t bad even if they have been light on revenue and topline growth.
- Bernanke claims he has more unconventional monetary tools in his arsenal that he can and will use if needed. QE for eternity?
- Economists baseline scenarios for everything coming up perpetually roses in Q2 and Q3 have now been slashed, thus announcements of future economic data will not present such contradictory evidence to their baseline scenarios. In fact, the second derivative pendulum may begin to swing from “less good” to “less bad.” Let us not forget the SP500 rallied more than 75% last year on just “less bad” news announcements!
The following pages simply detail a bullish rising wedge chart patterns forming in equities and a bearish declining wedge patterns potentially forming in treasuries.
According to studies by Thomas Bulkowski, rising wedges have a 92% success rate. Declining wedges have an 82% success rate. Wedges “occur more often during consolidations but are more dramatic after a climax” says Charles Kirkpatrick, adding that “it is extremely important to wait for the actual breakout from the wedge [because even though the failure rate is extremely low] wedges have a high percentage of premature breakout. Thus a premature breakout may be followed by prices reentering the wedge formation, but the original breakout direction is still very likely to be valid.”
Because the soundbites coming from the economic data over the course of the next few weeks are on balance expected to be bearish inputs for equities and bullish inputs for bonds, I think it is safe to say that while the equity bulls may eventually have the macro story right for the next few quarters, last week’s 5% intraweek rally should see some back and fill. That is, the SP500 should see some throwback over the next few weeks because the near term outlook is still a dark one. Thus, I would characterize last week’s equity rally as legit, but also as a bit speculative and early.
Outside Up Week Pushes SP 500 Above Bullish Declining Wedge
Declining wedges are bullish continuation patterns and rising wedges are bearish continuation patterns. When the upper trendline of a rising wedge is breached, as it was with this week’s outside up bullish signal, the bull trend is said to resume. This indicates that the July 6 low should be a valid support that will eventually breach the April 26 high targeting the August 2008 high at 1313.
Coincident with the SP500 forming a bullish declining wedge since May 2010, the 30 year treasury has likewise been forming a bearish rising wedge that may well have completed on Bernanke’s ‘unusually uncertain’ comments about the US economy on his semi-annual testimony to the Senate on July 21. But since the price of the 30 year has yet to fall below the rising trendline off the May 2010 lows, we can not be sure the decline off July 21 high set by Bernanke’s ‘unusually uncertain’ comments will take out the July 14 lows. The July 14 low was supported by Bernanke’s July 15 statement that it will take 5-6 years for the US economy to ‘converge’ to its potential growth rate. The Japanese love buying US treasuries on bad news such as Bernanke’s July 15 and July 21 comments. There is apt to be more bad news out of the US economy in the first half of August, so. The treasuries are as a result taking their sweet old time to signal a resolution to this bearish rising wedge pattern that formed in the past three months.
Another reason the caution in the equity markets over the course of the next few weeks is that the financial sector did not SP500 to new move highs in July this past week and still remain heavy as does the badly maligned energy sector and health care sector. These three sectors are apt to act as anchors on the broad market over the next few weeks until there is more clarity and uncertainties become less worrisome for a spell.
Just a picky comment–you use a malapropism that detracts from your article. The expression is “for all intents and purposes,” not “for all intensive purposes.”
Thank you, John.
So the legerdemain-Ponzi-confidence-shell games continue at a quickening pace. It seems that all this check-kiting must end very badly, no? Do you suppose Bernanke, Geithner, Summers et al. expect this, or do they believe that wishing and witching make it so?
It’s hard to imagine those guys and Greenspan, who enbaled John Paulson to make a kiling and now advises his fund for an undisclosed sum, really did not see the RE bubble. But surely this extend and pretend is now creating a monster of dimnsions no one has ever seen before.
Thanks Dolores,
@ Doug,
What the Rubinesque team of Geithner, Summers and others expect, who knows. How badly this ends when all is said and done, who knows, but as Yves has repeatedly pointed out via the Ken Rogoff Carmen Reinhardt historical study of banking crises, precedents suggest economic outcomes are more positive if the pain is taken up front rather than outcomes generated through extend and pretend policies.
To an extent, these guys have to believe or hope that their prescription; namely, extend and pretend policies and other Keynesian course of actions will be largely successful. And for ‘them’ they might view the economic outcomes that these policies generate will be the best possible for the financial sector. Obviously, however, the economic outcomes generated by these policies to save the financial industry at all costs for much of the rest of the world will be far less palatable.
As much as Obama wishes to generate the view that the interests of Wall Street and Main Street are much better aligned with the new FINREG legislation, that is a non sequitur. It does not follow that Main street and Wall Street are properly aligned through FinReg. Much of what FinReg really accomplished simply codified into law the malpractices of the bad actors of the financial industry.
I think it is extremely important that Main Street continue to recognize that its economic interests are not aligned with Wall Street’s interests or the political interests in Washington. I also think it is extremely important that Main Street does not become ‘captured’ by Obama’s claims that through FinReg Main Street and Wall Street are now properly aligned to generate positive economic outcomes on both sides of the street. This is a very dubious claim that Obama made when he signed that bill into law this past week, and I hope not to see it reiterated time and again.
“Much of what FinReg really accomplished simply codified into law the malpractices of the bad actors of the financial industry.”
Marshall Auerback said much the same on Monday at New Deal 2.0 in “The Trouble with Tim’s Treasury” and makes the more cirtical point that any potential good FinReg might effect is nullified by making enforcement entirely dependent on foxes in charge of the henhouse.
http://www.newdeal20.org/2010/07/19/the-trouble-with-tims-treasury-15302/
“FinReg may fall short if power is channeled into Geithner’s hands.”
“More depressing news from the “change” President. The Washington Post has reported that one of the major impacts of the FinReg bill passed last week by Congress is the accretion of new power to Obama’s Treasury Secretary. According to the Post, Tim Geithner stands to inherit vast power to shape bank regulations, oversee financial markets and create a consumer protection agency.”
“Make no mistake: this is Timmy’s bill, plain and simple, as the Post makes clear: “The bill not only hews closely to the initial draft he released last summer but also anoints him — as long as he remains Treasury secretary — as the chief of a new council of senior regulators.”
“The Geithner Treasury repeatedly pushed back against many sensible legislative proposals that would have made significant structural changes to practices that brought about the current economic crisis.”
“…How many managers have been replaced during the current crisis? [0] How many are being charged for fraudulent behavior? [0] Elizabeth Warren has at least made attempts at some sort of public accounting. As a result, her future job security is being compromised, despite the fact that Warren is the obvious choice to take over the newly formed Consumer Protection Agency.”
“…the Geithner Treasury has persistently frustrated every attempt to gain better understanding of the causes of the financial crisis via endless court challenges, obfuscation, lies and delaying tactics. Additionally, Treasury has consistently opposed any serious attempts to engender structural changes in the banking system as the Financial Regulation bill worked its way through Congress. Because Elizabeth Warren has refused to play ball with this insidious bankers’ club, she’s deemed not to be a “team player” by Geithner…”
“…extending unemployment benefits on Tuesday July 20th (made retroactively available for participants whose benefits expired in June and July) through Nov 1999…”
You really mean “Nov 1999”?
Thank you
Hi, really a useful blog. I think it is really a great topic to write about on my Website. Also here is some nice information: free drum loops
Consolidation Programs For People With Bad Financial Records Debts can become a real pain in the neck when we are not able to control them. The good thing is that, we do not have to live with this pain because, there are many ways to sort the issues out. One of the ways in which one can do this is to go for a ….
Be Your Own Financial Planner: Total Money Management in 21 Days Alibris Seller – Condition: Very Good – Very Good condition. Finansystem is a 30-day total money management system. Each daily worksheet activity falls into one of the seven categories that relate to personal financial planning: creating a financial ….