Impossible to Compete with Unintentional Self-Parody: Trump and Opioids

By Bill Black, the author of The Best Way to Rob a Bank is to Own One, an associate professor of economics and law at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, and co-founder of Bank Whistleblowers United. Originally published at New Economic Perspectives

This is the first in a series of columns I will write that are prompted by the joint 60 Minutes and Washington Post investigations of the role of Congress and the White House in making it far harder to sanction effectively companies selling massive numbers of opioids that they know will go largely to those addicted to opioids.  I will use the case study to illustrate many important points that criminologists know about elite white-collar crime and how to limit it and sanction perpetrators.

In this column, I introduce one of the most important concepts in white-collar crime – “seeming legitimacy.”  The most elite predators use the seemingly legitimate entities in the business, government, and non-profit sectors that they run as “weapons” of predation and “shields” against sanctions.  The criminology term for this is “control fraud.”  The same logic applies to non-criminal predation.  I will show in later columns in this series that Representative Marino (R, PA), the worst of the political shills for the opioid Predator Class, repeatedly spread the falsehood that the worst of the opioid predators could not be predators because they structured their firm as if it were “legitimate.”  As a former state and local prosecutor, Marino knows that CEOs running the largest frauds pose as seemingly legitimate firms because it optimizes control fraud.

Some of these columns will focus on the startling parallels to actions taken by Congress and the White House to aid the Predator Class’ epidemics of “control fraud” during the savings and loan (S&L) debacle and the opioid epidemic.  Congress and the White House gave aid and comfort to the elite criminals leading epidemics of criminal conduct and predation that they knew would cause catastrophic harm in both crises.

Edwin Sutherland, who coined the term “white-collar crime,” demonstrated the many ways in which such criminals were able to gain great riches, cause vast harm, and avoid meaningful sanctions.  At its worst, the predators so pervert truth and ethics that they successfully portray acts of murderous predation as laudatory.  This is the case with many elite wholesale suppliers, ‘pill mills,’ and prescribing physicians – the principal drivers and beneficiaries of the opioid crisis.  It is an ‘Alice in Wonderland’ world in which power and predation create an insane world dominated by the Predatory Class.  Crony capitalism and kleptocracy represent the cases of maximal power for the Predatory Class.

The next level of a rigged system is one in which the Predator Class’ actions are unlawful, but there are no effective sanctions against their predation.  This is why desupervision is typically far more destructive than deregulation.

The third level of a rigged system is when the only available enforcement actions against predation are non-criminal or the criminal and regulatory officials are unwilling to prosecute elite predators.  It is exceptionally difficult to deter the elite Predatory Class without significant criminal sanctions directly against elite corporate officers.

The fourth level of a rigged system is that the Predator Class tolerate modest enforcement actions that gave the appearance of the rule of law.  As long as the sanctions never threaten the overall predatory strategy of the most powerful CEOs the modest sanctions strengthen the Predatory Class by harassing smaller competitors.  This makes the system appear legitimate.  However, the Predator Class will suddenly push back and seek to use their elite social, political, and economic power to crush any enforcers or prosecutors who threaten to bring effective actions against the Predator Class.

In the opioid and S&L debacle, we witnessed elected traitors and anti-regulators who betrayed the citizens of the United States and their oaths of office, albeit for far more than 30 pieces of silver.  Political contributions, lobbying, and the “revolving door” are generally not crimes, so no prosecutor will ever charge these politicians and anti-regulators in a court with treason.  Their betrayal of the American people, however, maims and kills far more Americans than do those who commit formal treason or engage in street crimes.  The fact that these political elites and the Predator Class cynically exploit loopholes in the law available as a practical matter only to the wealthiest of Americans makes their predation on the American people more reprehensible.  Their fellow Americans gave the Predator Class vast benefits, yet the predators used their power and elite status to enrich themselves further by taking actions they know will cause immense misery and death.  When we think of predators, we typically think of “apex” predators like lions and killer whales (orcas), but the mass killers are parasites.  The Predator Class are parasites.     

One of the things that white collar criminologists want the public to know is that elite fraud and corruption, in addition to causing extraordinary financial loss, maim and kill.  In many countries, they maim and kill more people than do conventional “street” crimes.  Opioids exemplify that point.  Drug overdoses kill more Americans annually than died of AIDS at its peak U.S. death rate, homicides at their peak U.S. death rate, and car accidents at their peak.  (These data exclude deaths from overdoses of a major drug category, alcohol.)  The Congressional and White House scandal is about prescription opioids, but it is increasingly common for those addicted to prescription opioids to progress to using the far more lethal synthetic opioids such as Fentanyl, heroin, and drug ‘cocktails.’  Crushing prescription opioids can defeat the designed delayed release and greatly intensify the effective dosage, as can other means of ingesting the drug.

Here is the bare bones background you need to understand the context of this first column.  Big pharma pitched opioids to patients, doctors, regulators, and the Congress as being exceptionally unlikely to prove addictive.  That was a lie.  Many physicians prescribed opioids to patients for uses such as chronic back pain and arthritis.  Doctors never should have prescribed opioids for such purposes.  Long-term use of prescription opioids poses a serious risk of addiction and can exacerbate chronic pain.  As the frequency of opioid use grew massively, everyone honest in the pharma chain realized that it posed a critical health threat to our Nation that required emergency steps to contain to prevent the deaths of many thousands of Americans annually.

Long before opioids kill their users they often cause devastating harm to the users, their families, and to local community budgets.  Dr. Francis Colllns, the NIH director, recently testified.

According the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)’s National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), in 2016, over 11 million Americans misused prescription opioids, nearly 1 million used heroin, and 2.1 million had an opioid use disorder due to prescription opioids or heroin. Over the past decade, the U.S. has experienced significant increases in rates of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), hepatitis C infections, and opioid-related emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Most alarming are the continued increases in overdose deaths, especially the rapid increase since 2013 in deaths involving illicitly made fentanyl and other highly potent synthetic opioids. Since 2000, more than 300,000 Americans have died of an opioid overdose. Preliminary data for 2016 indicate at least 64,000 drug overdose deaths, the highest number ever recorded in the U.S. Too many of our citizens are being robbed of their God-given potential in the prime of their life.

The diversion and dealing of prescription opioids is a major part of the problem.  In the U.S., three big pharma companies control the distribution of opioids.  They have readily available data that allows them to identify quickly, cheaply, and reliably the primary sources of diversion and dealing because these drug stores and pain clinics purchase opioids in amounts that are nonsensical given the size of the local population and stores making the purchases.  The first scandal, therefore, is that the big three distributors continue to sell to firms that they know are diverting and dealing opioids in ways that are illegal and murderous.  We should not need laws or rules to prevent the distributors from profiting from sales to obvious diverters and dealers.  The people who run big pharma are experts in what opioids do to humans.  All of big pharma firms have senior officers who are doctors and chemists.  They know the human misery and murder their sales to the diverters are certain to produce in staggering numbers.  When elite doctors and chemists are willing to profit by selling to those they know to be dealers and diverters who will maim and murder their countrymen and women you know the rot lies deep in our elites.

As a criminologist and lawyer, I believe that much of what the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) does is harmful and represents insane priorities used selectively against blacks and Latinos in obscene manners.  Criminalizing drug use is typically a fruitless and harmful approach.  The criminal justice system should be only part of our response to the opioid crisis.  Criminal sanctions are, however, the vital response to big pharma and the pill mills’ criminal and predatory acts.

The DEA’s Joe Rannazzisi tried to warn Congress that legislation it was considering would gut one of the DEA’s primary tools to prevent big pharma from making massive sales to pill mills. For the high crime of speaking truth to power, Representatives Marsha Blackburn (Tenn.) and Tom Marino (Pa.), the twin primary sponsors of the bill that big pharma drafted to gut DEA’s ability to sanction big pharma, led the reprisals that forced Rannazzisi out after nearly 30 years of government service.

Congress’ gutting of DEA’s enforcement authority against what Rannazzisi aptly labeled “drug dealers in lab coats,” was disgustingly parallel to multiple actions that Congress and the administration took to aid the Predatory Class leading the fraud epidemics that drove the S&L debacle.  Each of these actions constitutes an act of unintentional self-parody.  The supreme act of unintentional self-parody was President Trump seeking to appoint Marino to run the DEA.  It takes a Trumpian level of talent to reward Marino’s act of betraying the American people through obscene legislation and his leading the reprisals against DEA whistleblower with an appointment to run the DEA.  Fortunately, the 60 Minutes documentary’s disclosures about Marino’s betrayal and unfitness showed that Trump’s actions appalled the American people.

Trump and Congress should take three actions immediately in light of the recent disclosures.  First, Trump said that he was going to declare a national opioid emergency over 70 days ago – and still failed to sign an emergency order.  He should do so immediately.

Trump also told reporters he would formalize his Aug. 10 national emergency declaration by signing it and sending it to Congress this week. That would enable the executive branch to direct millions of federal dollars toward things like expanding drug treatment facilities and supplying police officers with the anti-overdose remedy naloxone.

Second, the same source makes clear that Congress should repeal Marino’s act of betrayal.

Meanwhile, Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., announced Monday she would introduce legislation that would repeal the law Marino championed, saying it has “significantly affected the government’s ability to crack down on opioid distributors that are failing to meet their obligations and endangering our communities.”

Third, Trump should fill the DEA vacancy by nominating the public servant who has demonstrated his excellence, integrity, and courage – Joe Rannazzini.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

12 comments

  1. lyman alpha blob

    Big pharma pitched opioids to patients, doctors, regulators, and the Congress as being exceptionally unlikely to prove addictive.

    Very true and it’s been going on for a while. Over a decade ago my wife went in to the doctor with a mild pain which she described as a 2 on a scale of 1-10. They found the cause and it was nothing serious and yet one of the orderlies (not sure what their position at the hospital was) tried to give her oxycontin. I asked whether that wasn’t very addictive and not really necessary for a pain described as a 2 and was told that I was thinking of oxycodone and this was completely harmless. I was pretty sure at the time they were both addictive opioids and confirmed that when I got home and was able to look it up and double check. It’s a travesty when patients know more about the drugs being pushed than the supposed medical professionals do.

    It’s the hospitals pushing these drugs that is the major source of this epidemic. The one where my wife had opioids pushed on her receives a large amount of funding from the Bush family. Maybe that’s just a coincidence….

    1. Nordberg

      I visited the ER one weekend due to a mild case of diverticulitis. My Dr. would not call in a script for antibiotics and it was too late to go to the doc in a box. I rated my pain as a 2 as well. The ER doctor thought it would be a could idea to hook me up to some saline, even though I had no signs of dehydration and he never checked, and give me some morphine. My father-in-law, a doctor and Joint Commission surveyor, came back from grabbing some water from the cafeteria and let the ER doctor have it.

      The ER doctor said something along the lines of, “Well the joint commission requires that we treat pain.”

      My father-in-law said something along the lines of, “I did not want to do this. But, I am a JCo surveyor and there are other avenues of mild pain treatment and you absolutely did not check for signs of dehydration.”

      The back peddling ensued and we fought the extra charges for the IV and the morphine. I guess this could be filed under yesterday’s over treatment story as well.

  2. mle detroit

    And let’s not forget dentists. They have drug licenses. I met a recently retired DDS last night who said he had prescribed opioids until he learned how addictive they are, thereafter advised patients to rely on Tylenol, Advil, etc Al.

    1. Angie Neer

      Absolutely. I suspect dentists are particularly eager to avoid inflicting any pain whatsoever, to counteract their historical reputation. I had a couple of wisdom teeth extracted a few years ago. Before starting, his assistant said, “OK, let’s get you set with a pain prescription. What’s you’re favorite painkiller?” Seriously. I said I have no idea, I’ve never used any (due more to luck than to virtue). They seemed a bit surprised, and prescribed me some oxy-something-or-other, which I never filled or needed. I know there are people who really do need that stuff, but I found their eagerness to hand it out a disturbing sign of the times.

      1. ABasLesAristocrates

        “I know there are people who really do need that stuff”

        And this is the beginning of the pendulum swing back in the other direction. In 5 years you won’t be able to get pain meds if you’ve lost an arm. The introduction of synthetic opioids – whether pharma acted in bad faith or not, which of course I believe they did – was at least nominally to address underprescription of pain medication due to doctors’ aversion to drug-seekers. Unfortunately, since Americans are allergic to anything holistic, comprehensive, or nuanced, absolute prohibition is where we’re headed.

        At least weed is legal most places now. It may be people’s only recourse soon.

  3. Ian Perkins

    If you ask me, it’s the doctors and regulators we should be asking why they prescribed them and allowed them.
    It’s been well-known for decades that opioid painkillers are addictive. If someone claimed to have found or invented one, the highest standard of evidence should have been required, and a simple experiment would have disproved the idea – give a junky a free supply of oxycodone or whatever, then try taking it away!
    Private companies are obliged to maximise shareholder profit, I believe. Doctors and regulators are supposed to protect us, so what’s their excuse?

    1. PKMKII

      It goes back to the medical schools, who brainwash doctors-in-training to always reach for the prescription drugs as the answer for everything and to think of the pharma rep as their friend, instead of critical thinking and therapeutic approaches.

  4. Eclair

    “In the opioid and S&L debacle, we witnessed elected traitors and anti-regulators who betrayed the citizens of the United States and their oaths of office, albeit for far more than 30 pieces of silver. Political contributions, lobbying, and the “revolving door” are generally not crimes, so no prosecutor will ever charge these politicians and anti-regulators in a court with treason. Their betrayal of the American people, however, maims and kills far more Americans than do those who commit formal treason or engage in street crimes. The fact that these political elites and the Predator Class cynically exploit loopholes in the law available as a practical matter only to the wealthiest of Americans makes their predation on the American people more reprehensible. Their fellow Americans gave the Predator Class vast benefits, yet the predators used their power and elite status to enrich themselves further by taking actions they know will cause immense misery and death. When we think of predators, we typically think of “apex” predators like lions and killer whales (orcas), but the mass killers are parasites. The Predator Class are parasites.”

    The US prison system is filled with poor people, most of them poor people of color, who have committed these ‘street crimes;’ robbing convenience stores, selling drugs (!!), using drugs. So many that a whole new profitable business of running prisons and monitoring parolees has arisen.

    And, language matters. It’s time we stopped calling the people who profit from these death-dealing enterprises by laudatory titles; captain of industry (well, that’s a bit outdated), CEO, entrepreneur, elite, master of the universe, ruling class. Label them as what they are: Blood-Suckers, Parasites, the Predator Class.

    All the those who profit from the death and misery of living beings, as well as those who reap wealth from the destruction of the earth and the poisoning of its air and waters. The Predator Class. The Global Parasites.

  5. Enquiring Mind

    Level I, II, III & IV seem somehow appropriate.
    In that system, we’d all seem destined to end up needing care in the IV level.
    Imagine a league table or similar construct that provided a scorecard of sorts to show which caregivers or caretakers or careless fakers fell into which Level, then publicize that and implement it as part of routine relicensing and as part of primary medical and dental education, too.
    Don’t forget to review the reviewers, and have the legislative and regulatory apparati (with their apparatchiks!) held up to scrutiny.

  6. Autonomous

    After two consecutive days of Yves posting articles (Esquire Monday and the New Yorker Tuesday) on the Sackler family’s sole role in fomenting and promulgating the opioid crisis with their firm’s darling drug OxyCon and Bill Black can write this column without mentioning their name? Wow. Either they have incredible PR or they have some kind of machine that mesmerizes. Certainly other pharma companies bear responsibility, but the lion’s share of the blame for this crisis clearly rests on one drug: OxyCon. And one family-owned company held the patent and did the pushing of those pills.

  7. Kevin Curry

    As a pharmacist, I’m so glad this issue is finally being debated at a much larger scale. We’ve been caught playing police between doctors who are too eager to prescribe and manufacturers/distributors who are too eager to supply them for far too long. One misstep on our part and professional licenses or pharmacy licenses are lost, the offending prescriber or distributor, however, usually doesn’t even come into the picture.

  8. JBird

    Back of of the envelope calculations say that around four percent of the entire American population has an opioid problem.

    I am really hoping that those numbers are extremely too high.

    I remember much of the whole damn, horrible, awful, depressing AIDS epidemic here in the Bay Area. I wasn’t even living in the city then, just being in the area and knowing people who were dying. Just reading the obituaries was bad, although for much of the period people were dying after a “brief illness.” I guess it was often true as not having an effective immune system anymore would allow a brief illnesses like pneumonia. It got to be darkly amusing to see that description so often.

    So over fifty thousand dead every year concentrated in poorer neighborhoods of socially undesirable people like gays. I wonder if obituaries are lying with the truth again, but now with overdoses.

    Now that I’ve made myself sad, I am going to add some anger. The DEA puts quotas on the yearly production of some drugs because some drugs are bad. I have read in the past few years of shortages of necessary drugs because of theses limits. But not opioids. You will be happy to know that they will putting in a 25% reduction in allowable opioid production. It took them some years to do it, but better late than never, right?

    This is from 2015

    =“http://https://www.thedailybeast.com/dea-secretly-oks-killer-quantities-of-oxy-and-morphine”

    People suffer and some die because the DEA has some whacked criteria of how much of some medicines can be made. They refused to increase the amount of legal marijuana but are just fine with flooding poor communities with opioids for example.

Comments are closed.