‘Worse Than People Can Imagine’: Medicaid ‘Unwinding’ Breeds Chaos in States

Yves here. The new Medicaid cutbacks are yet another implementation of Lambert’s second rule of neoliberalism: “Die faster.” Rates of disability have been marching steadily higher over the decades, even before getting to the still-not-sufficiently-recognized impact of Long Covid. As a new article from the Center for American Progress pointed out:

Despite public fatigue around anything related to COVID-19, the virus continues to show its presence, with a slight uptick in hospitalizations and deaths in late summer and early fall 2023 and millions of Americans continuing to deal with the ramifications. In fact, according to estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Household Pulse Survey, more than 13 million adults in the United States had COVID-19 symptoms lasting three months or longer, commonly known as long COVID, from late August to early September. Concerningly, about 81 percent of them—or approximately 10.5 million adults—reported that their symptoms at least somewhat affected their day-to-day activities. At this point, 15.2 percent, or more than 1 in 7, of all American adults have had long COVID, broadly defined by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as “signs, symptoms, and conditions that continue or develop after acute COVID-19 infection.” And notably, these effects have been disproportionately felt, both directly and indirectly, by disabled people and low-income families, as well as by Black, American Indian/Alaskan Native, and Hispanic populations.

Or in the words of Terry Pratchett:

Captain Vimes: “Corporal Nobbs, why are you kicking people when they’re down ?”

Nobby: “Safest way, sir.”

By Phil Galewitz and Katheryn Houghton and Brett Kelman and Samantha Liss. Originally published at KFF Health News

People line up outside a public assistance office in Missoula, Montana, before its doors open at 8 a.m., Oct. 27, 2023, to try to regain Medicaid coverage after being dropped from the government insurance program for people with low incomes and disabilities. Each said they had experienced long waits on the state’s phone helpline. (Katheryn Houghton/KFF Health News)

More than two dozen people lined up outside a state public assistance office in Montana before it opened to ensure they didn’t get cut off from Medicaid.

The parents of a disabled man in Tennessee who had been on Medicaid for three decades fought with the state this summer to keep him enrolled as he lay dying from pneumonia in a hospital.

Seven months into what was predicted to be the biggest upheaval in the 58-year history of the government health insurance program for people with low incomes and disabilities, states have reviewed the eligibility of more than 28 million people and terminated coverage for over 10 million of them. Millions more are expected to lose Medicaid in the coming months.

The unprecedented enrollment drop comes after federal protections ended this spring that had prohibited states from removing people from Medicaid during the three pandemic years. Since March 2020, enrollment in Medicaid and the related Children’s Health Insurance Program had surged by more than 22 million to reach 94 million people.

The process of reviewing all recipients’ eligibility has been anything but smooth for many Medicaid enrollees. Some are losing coverage without understanding why. Some are struggling to prove they’re still eligible. Recipients and patient advocates say Medicaid officials sent mandatory renewal forms to outdated addresses, miscalculated income levels, and offered clumsy translations of the documents. Attempting to process the cases of tens of millions of people at the same time also has exacerbated long-standing weaknesses in the bureaucratic system. Some suspect particular states have used the confusing system to discourage enrollment.

“It’s not just bad, but worse than people can imagine,” said Camille Richoux, health policy director for the nonprofit Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families. “This unwinding has not been about determining who is eligible by all possible means, but how we can kick people off by all possible means.”

To be sure, some of the Medicaid recipients who signed on to the program when the U.S. unemployment rate soared amid covid-19 lockdowns have since gotten health insurance through new jobs as unemployment dropped back to pre-pandemic lows.

And some of the disenrolled are signing up for Affordable Care Act marketplace plans. Centene CEO Sarah London, for example, told investors on Oct. 24 that the health care giant expected as many as 2.4 million of its 15 million Medicaid managed care members to lose coverage from the unwinding, but more than 1 million customers had joined its exchange plans since the same time last year.

Still, it’s anyone’s guess how many former Medicaid beneficiaries remain uninsured. States don’t track what happens to everyone after they’re disenrolled. And the final tallies likely won’t be known until 2025, after the unwinding finishes by next summer and federal officials survey Americans’ insurance status.

Without Medicaid, Patients Miss Appointments

Trish Chastain, 35, of Springfield, Missouri, said her Medicaid coverage is scheduled to expire at the end of the year. Though her children are still covered, she no longer qualifies because her income is too high at $22 an hour. Chastain’s employer, a rehab center, offers health insurance but her share of the premium would be $260 a month. “I can’t afford that with my monthly budget,” she said.

She said she did not know she might be eligible for a lower-cost plan on the Affordable Care Act marketplace. That still would mean new costs for her, though.

Gaps in coverage can jeopardize people’s access to health services or their financial security if they get medical bills for care they cannot postpone.

“Any type of care that’s put off — whether it’s asthma, whether it’s autism, whether it’s something as simple as an earache — can just get worse if you wait,” said Pam Shaw, a pediatrician in Kansas City, Kansas, who chairs the American Academy of Pediatrics’ state government affairs committee.

Doctors and representatives of community health centers around the country said they have seen an uptick in cancellations and no-shows among patients without coverage — including children. Nationwide, states have already disenrolled at least 1.8 million children in the 20 states that provide the data by age. Children typically qualify more easily than adults, so child advocates believe many kids are being wrongly terminated based on their parents’ being deemed no longer eligible. Meanwhile, enrollment in CHIP, which has higher income eligibility levels than Medicaid, has shown only a tiny increase.

Kids accounted for varying shares of those disenrolled in each state, ranging from 68% in Texas to 16% in Massachusetts, according to KFF. In September, President Joe Biden’s administration said most states were conducting eligibility checks incorrectly and inappropriately disenrolling eligible children or household members. It ordered states to reinstate coverage for some 500,000 people.

Varying Timetables, Varying Rates of Disenrollment

Idaho, one of a few states that completed the unwind in six months, said it disenrolled 121,000 people of the 153,000 recipients it reviewed as of September because it suspected they were no longer eligible with the end of the public health emergency. Of those kicked off, about 13,600 signed up for private coverage on the state’s ACA marketplace, said Pat Kelly, executive director of Your Health Idaho, the state’s exchange. What happened to the rest, state officials say they don’t know.

California, by contrast, started terminating recipients only this summer and is automatically transferring coverage from Medicaid to marketplace plans for those eligible.

The Medicaid disenrollment rates of people reviewed so far vary dramatically by state, largely along a blue-red political divide, from a low of 10% in Illinois to a high of 65% in Texas.

“I feel like Illinois is doing everything in their power to ensure that as few people lose coverage as possible,” said Paula Campbell of the Illinois Primary Health Care Association, which represents dozens of community health centers.

Nationwide, about 71% of Medicaid enrollees terminated during the unwinding have been cut because of procedural issues, such as not responding to requests for information to verify their eligibility. It’s unclear how many are actually still eligible.

State and local Medicaid officials say they have tried contacting enrollees in multiple ways — including through letters, phone calls, emails, and texts — to check their eligibility. Yet some Medicaid recipients lack consistent addresses or internet service, do not speak English, or are juggling more pressing needs.

“The unwinding effort continues to be very challenging and a significant lift for all states,” said Kate McEvoy, executive director of the National Association of Medicaid Directors.

‘People Are Not Getting Through’

In many states, that has meant enrollees have faced long waits to get help with renewals. The worst phone waits were in Missouri, according to a KFF Health News review of letters the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services sent to states in August. In the letter to Missouri’s Medicaid program, CMS said it was concerned that the average wait time of 48 minutes and the 44% rate of Missourians abandoning those calls in May was “impeding equitable access” to assistance and patients’ ability to maintain coverage.

Some people are waiting on hold more than three hours, said Sunni Johnson, an enrollment worker at Affinia Healthcare, which runs community health centers in the St. Louis area. That’s a significant hurdle for a population in which many have limited cellphone minutes.

In Florida, which has removed over 730,000 people from the program since April, enrollees earlier this year were waiting almost 2½ hours on a Spanish-language call center, according to a report from UnidosUS, a civil rights advocacy group. The Spanish versions of the Medicaid application, renewal website, and other communications are also confusing, said Jared Nordlund, the Florida director for UnidosUS.

“They can barely get the Spanish translations right,” he said.

Miguel Nevarez, press secretary for Florida’s Department of Children and Families, which is managing the state’s Medicaid redetermination process, criticized complaints about poor translations and long waits for the Spanish-language call center as a “false narrative.” He said, “The data clearly shows Florida has executed a fair and effective plan for redeterminations.”

In California, similarly jammed phone lines, crowded and understaffed county offices, and trouble downloading renewal applications electronically are all “compounding people’s difficulty to renew” their Medicaid, said Skyler Rosellini, a senior attorney in the Los Angeles office of the National Health Law Program. “We do know, based on the cases we’re getting, that people are not getting through.”

Jasmine McClain, a 31-year-old medical assistant, said she tried everything before Montana ended Medicaid coverage for her kids, ages 3 and 5, in early October. She tried submitting paperwork online and over fax to prove they still qualified. She spent hours on hold with the state hotline. After her kids’ coverage ended, she went to a state public assistance office in Missoula but couldn’t get an appointment. One day in mid-October, roughly 30 people lined up outside the office starting as early as 6:40 a.m., before its doors opened.

After three weeks of her pleading for help while her kids were uninsured, the state restored her kids’ coverage. She said a supervisor told her the family’s paperwork submitted online wasn’t processed initially.

“The phone call system was a mess. Callbacks were a week out to even talk to somebody,” McClain said. “It just was just a lot of hurdles that I had to get through.”

Spokespeople for the Montana, Florida, and Missouri Medicaid programs all said their states had reduced call wait times.

Some Medicaid recipients are seeking help through the courts. In a 2020 class-action lawsuit against Tennessee that seeks to pause the Medicaid eligibility review, parents of recipients describe spending hours on the phone or online with the state Medicaid program, trying to ensure their children’s insurance coverage is not lost.

One of those parents, Donna Guyton, said in a court filing that Tennessee’s Medicaid program, called TennCare, sent a June letter revoking the coverage of her 37-year-old son, Patrick, who had been eligible for Medicaid because of disabilities since he was 6. As Guyton made calls and filed appeals to protect her son’s insurance, he was hospitalized with pneumonia, then spent weeks there before dying in late July.

“While Patrick was fighting for his life, TennCare was threatening to take away his health insurance coverage and the services he relied on,” she said in a court filing. “Though we should have been able to focus on Patrick’s care, our family was required to navigate a system that kept denying his eligibility and putting his health coverage at risk.”

TennCare said in a court filing Patrick Guyton’s Medicaid coverage was never actually revoked — the termination letter was sent to his family because of an “error.”

Phil Galewitz in Washington, D.C., wrote this article. Daniel Chang in Hollywood, Florida; Katheryn Houghton in Missoula, Montana; Brett Kelman in Nashville, Tennessee; Samantha Liss and Bram Sable-Smith in St. Louis; and Bernard J. Wolfson in Los Angeles contributed to this report.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

20 comments

  1. Mikerw0

    This is so frustrating. Yet, in many of these states they keep electing people that perpetrate these policies. What am I missing. Total cognitive dissonance.

    1. Randall Flagg

      No thinking needed when it comes to voting for most people, it’s quite simple.
      Vote Team Blue no matter who.
      Or, I’ll vote Team Red until I’m dead. God forbid much actual thought goes into questioning the policies and motives of those running for office.
      Sarcasm off now.

    2. New_Okie

      I’m starting to think we made a mistake in the USA not going with a parliamentary democracy. At least with those if you find both of the dominant parties abhorrent you aren’t totally throwing your vote away when you vote for someone else.

      1. steppenwolf fetchit

        Israel is a case of parliamentary democracy run amok. A small fringe of nastiest possible people voted for Smotrich(?) and that other guy (pardon my lapse of memory) instead of “throwing their votes away”. Netanyahu turned to them for reaching the finish line on his coalition government.

        Is there a ” kinder gentler” form of parliamentary democracy?

        But I realize that unless we can somehow legalize Third, Fourth, Fifth Parties in fact as well as in “law”, the temptation to go to parliamentary democracy will get stronger and stronger.

      2. Victor Sciamarelli

        Short of a parliamentary system which would likely requirer rewriting the Constitution, and which in todays environment is impossible, there are alternatives such as fusion and rank choice voting. But both of these are discouraged, if not banned, by the R&Ds.
        Fusion allows you to form a party say the ‘Peace Party’ or ‘M4A Party’ or the ‘Labor Party’ and still nominate Joe Biden for president. And if you vote for these alternative parties, Biden still gets your vote. However, if 40% of Biden’s votes comes from those who voted M4A, another 40% who voted Peace or Labor, and only 20% voted straight DP, it sends a clear message where people stand and what they care most about.
        In the case of rank choice, you vote for your preferred candidates in order of preference. That is, if your top choice doesn’t win your vote automatically goes to your second choice, and on. This allows voting for third party types without throwing your vote away.

    3. truly

      Wait? There is an organized party that would like to end these policies that someone could vote for? I think the cognitive dissonance is around thinking that either party as they exist care to quit perpetrating these issues.
      Both parties ascribe to Lamberts Law.

    4. CaliDan

      Excellent turn of phrase, Mikerw0! I can just picture the emcee of a boxing match:

      “And in this corner, weighing in at 85 pounds, the perpetrator of policy, the ice cream killer of Cali…” etc.

    5. earthling

      You’re missing angry lower middle class working people paying an arm and a leg for coverage with $9000 deductibles and $1000 ambulance fees and maybe medical bankruptcy, who see Medicaid recipients getting a much better deal, and they think they are free riders, and they hate it. And instead of getting angry at the horrible system, they love seeing government cut off people they see as welfare bums.

  2. Gregorio

    While hundreds of thousands of Americans declare bankruptcy from medical debt every year, millions are saddled with college loan debt, and now millions more are losing the safety net of Medicaid, the priority of our government is to spend tens of billions of dollars bankrolling the genocide campaign of a country whose citizens enjoy universal health care and subsidized university educations.

    1. Rubicon

      Our “government” is wholly subservient to the US Financial Hegemon filled with wealthy to “very” wealthy Aristocrats.

    2. Whiteylockmandoubled

      It’s important to understand how normal all of this is. This happens every month and every year all over the country. It’s extreme right now because the federal government stopped the process for COVID and so you have a couple of dozen monthly massacres concentrated in one moment.

      It’s great that people are noticing, but this is what Medicaid is. This is the “safety net.” In many states if you get a raise or a better job, you’re required to tell the government and you can lose coverage at the end of the month. In any case you have to grovel and convince the government that you and your family are deservingly poor enough to warrant health insurance at least every year.

      Medicaid is a paradox. It’s a desperately needed lifeline for millions of people and a rope that snaps millions of times a year because it’s a degrading, unreliable, administrative nightmare that segregates poor people from everyone else, all at the same time.

  3. floyd

    Have people not been informed that citizens are supposed to invest in LLY, MDT, UNH, etc and use the dividends to fund their healthcare expenses? The circle of life!

    The real problem is that the average American can’t afford the US healthcare system without massive subsidies from the government or an employer.

    Things will get real exciting when the wealthy abandon public hospitals, doctors, etc. and create an entirely private parallel system.

  4. John Steinbach

    Those who are transferred to ACA plans are faced with $6,000 annual deductibles or high premiums. For many lower income people, they still can’t use the “healthcare system.”

    1. timbers

      “Those who are transferred to ACA plans are faced with $6,000 annual deductibles or high premiums.” ******** S/B “Those who are transferred to ACA plans are faced with $6,000 annual deductibles AND high premiums.” The $6,000 and greater deductible ensures most pay for most of their their Healthcare AND the high premiums. Right now I pay almost $6,000 a year in property taxes on my house in Massachusetts. If I move to Knoxville when I retire, I get a comparable home for about half the price, pay 1/3rd in property taxes, and no income tax. So it only makes sense to stay in Massachusetts as long as I don’t retire and keep working.

  5. Michael Fiorillo

    Fifteen million people lost their Medicaid eligibility on the day the first Trump indictment (over Stormy Daniels) was announced. Needless to say, the #McResistance was busy advertising its moral outrage over Trump’s petty business evasions, and said nothing then or since, because moral vanity and outrage over Trump are so much more emotionally satisfying than engaging in actual politics, where you might actually have to encounter someone unlike yourself.

    1. Lefty Godot

      World War III could be breaking out, but Democratic aligned blogs and websites would still have most of their articles featuring a headline with “Trump” in it. At this point they stand for nothing but being against Trump. From FDR to this, a long sad fall.

      1. steppenwolf fetchit

        The Democratic Party didn’t fall, it was pushed. Pushed by New Democrats from within, but still pushed.

  6. Rubicon

    Why should this be considered new “news?” If you understand that the US has become a full-fledged “Autocratic Oligarchy” then all this makes sense.

    Next, the multi-billionaires will go after lower to/middle class folks. And eventually the whole system will wipe out parts of the upper class folks.

    This is what happened to the Roman Empire. In it’s “end times” even some of the Roman Aristocrats didn’t make it either.

    1. steppenwolf fetchit

      What is interesting is that ” East” Rome ( Byzantium) outlasted “West” Rome by a thousand years. Does anyone care to speculate on what part or parts of America might be the new Byzantium?

Comments are closed.