The proposal comes just months after the European Parliament and the European Council of Ministers unanimously approved the European Commission’s sweeping digital identity regulations.
As readers have presumably guessed, the asterisked word in the title is not “wink”.
Spain’s Pedro Sánchez government recently unveiled plans to push the boundaries of Internet control by launching a digital age verification system to prevent minors from being able to access pornographic websites. A few days ago, the country’s Minister of Digital Transformation (an increasingly common government position), José Luis Escrivá announced that the system will be based on a digital wallet app that is currently in the beta phase of testing. In other words, the app is not quite ready yet but apparently will be by September.
Through said app, adult porn users will be able to obtain anonymous digital access credentials. And those credentials will soon be necessary to enter digital spaces hosting adult content. The whole process will be fairly simple, according to the Spanish newspaper ABC:
The user will only have to register their age through the Digital Wallet by using an official document, such as an electronic ID. They will then be able to generate an anonymous credential that will allow them to enter the porn website. When the Internet user tries to access it, the page in question will be able to check their age through this verification system by reading a QR code. If the user is of legal age and therefore has the access credential, they will be able to consume content; if not, entry will be blocked.
The access credentials will not reveal user data, but will simply confirm whether the user is an adult or a minor. Before imparting that information to any website, the software will verify that the platform in question is a “trusted” entity against a list compiled by the authorities — presumably in the vein of the Trusted News Initiative, but for porn providers.
Rationing Pornography for Adults
The digital wallet will not only close off access to porn websites to minors; it will also ration the number of times adult users can access pornography websites, reports WIRED magazine’s Spanish edition:
The Digital Wallet works as an electronic purse that offers the user a batch of 30 anonymous access credits that are generated within the [mobile] device and are valid for a maximum of 30 days. The system will automatically assign a maximum of three access keys to each pornography platform. “These are used randomly within the same provider a maximum of 10 times and never between several services. When the 30 credits have been used up, 10 for each of the three credentials, another subset of 3 credentials will be selected from the batch of 30,” explains the ministry. A new set of keys will be issued each month.
This is all apparently necessary to prevent government authorities or the companies subcontracted to manage the system from being able to trace users’ browsing habits. But according to remarks made by Escrivá, the 30-day validity period and the number of access keys granted during that time could change if deemed necessary. In other words, the government wants to grant itself the power to determine exactly how much pornography adults can consume on a monthly basis.
The government claims that these intrusive measures are needed in order to prevent minors from accessing sexual material online. It is a powerful pretext (we will discuss the government’s real motive later). Given the ubiquity and nature of online porn these days (yes, I have been a periodic user, though not for a number of years), with much of it violent and/or degrading, there is an argument to be made for restricting accessibility to impressionable minors, especially pre-teens.
“If we don’t all work together, this problem will be impossible to solve,” says Escrivá. During the presentation of the new digital wallet, the minister pointed out that “the vast majority of young people between 18 and 26 years of age see internet porn as a faithful representation of sexual intercourse.” He also stressed that the consumption of this kind of content shapes minors’ perception of sexual relations into adulthood, noting that the number of sexual assaults perpetrated by minors has more than doubled in the past five years.
The proposed digital identity wallet, which has already been dubbed on social media as “pajaporte” — an amalgam of the Spanish words “paja” (to jerk off or wank) and “pasaporte” — has been ridiculed in most quarters, including parts of the mainstream media. A column in El País by Daniel Gascon sarcastically asks: “what is the point of having a welfare state is if it can’t keep track of citizens’ masturbatory habits?” It also notes, again with what seems like a healthy helping of irony, that if there is one thing the proposal is guilty of, it is “a lack of ambition”:
[T]he ideal scenario would be for the Government to authorise the use of any application. This would allow it to better protect citizens, see what they read, what jokes and news they share. It is a matter of public health. But, in the meantime, this is a start.
This article, it seems, was written in jest. But it could be worryingly close to the truth. The Spanish government is already talking of requiring a similar digital identity wallet to access other online platforms. Carmen Cabanillas, director general of Governance at the Ministry of Digital Transformation, said that in the future the tool could be used by messaging applications, social networks or browsers to check the age of users, as well as presumably other things.
Such proposals are eerily reminiscent of some of the use cases (telecommunications, social platforms) depicted on the World Economic Forum’s now-infamous 2018 infographic on digital identity.
There are, of course, serious flaws in the government’s proposed “pajaporte”. For a start, the digital verification system will only be mandatory for adult content websites hosted in Spain. In other words, once the system is up and running (assuming it ever is), users, regardless of their age, will be able to continue accessing the vast majority of adult content sites on the Internet without any government hindrance. And if someone specifically wants to continue accessing Spanish-hosted porn, they could do so by simply using a VPN.
Presumably, there will be a plethora of other workarounds that (both adult and underage) porn users will be able to use to circumvent the proposed restrictions. As they say here in Spain, “hecha la ley, hecha la trampa,” which essentially means that once a law is approved, someone will find a way of getting around it. And this proposed law has more potential loopholes than a medieval castle. In other words, it is likely to have a limited impact on the amount of Internet porn consumed in Spain, whether by adults or minors.
The Real Motive
That said, the Spanish Government claims that other EU countries are working on similar measures, so that, over time, visiting adult websites without proof of age will become more and more difficult across the EU. The Sánchez government is also apparently considering making changes to Spain’s General Telecommunications Law that will essentially ban access to digital platforms that do not incorporate age verification mechanisms.
The real motive here, I believe, is not to protect children from the insidious effects of online porn; it is to begin the process of launching digital identity wallets for widespread public use. Spain’s Ministry for Digital Transformation insists its proposed digital identity wallet complies fully with the standards established in the European Regulation on Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions (eIDAS2).
This is the part of the story that isn’t getting nearly the amount of attention it deserves in the Spanish media. But it is a story we have already covered in our article, Greece Just Gave a Glimpse of How the EU’s “Voluntary” Digital ID Wallet Will Gradually Become Mandatory:
Unbeknown to most EU citizens, digital identity is now a legal reality across the 27-nation bloc. On February 28, the European Parliament gave its final approval to the European Commission’s Digital Identity Regulation with a comfortable majority of 335 votes to 190, with 31 abstentions. The EU Council of Ministers gave its blessing on March 26. According to the Commission, the next step will be its publication in the Official Journal and its entry into force 20 days later, which by my calculations will be in just three days’ time.
The EU regulation obliges all member states to make a digital identity wallet available to every citizen who wants one. That is how the new system is currently being marketed — as an optional extra for citizens who want to avail of its many benefits. The wallet can be used to store people’s surnames, first names, dates and place of birth, gender, or nationality as well as enable Europeans to identify themselves online. Its touted benefits include making it easier to access public and private-sector services across EU borders, helping to streamline bureaucracy and reduce the risks of digital fraud and other forms of cyber crime.
This, one might think, would be a big news story given the potential of digital identity to transform, for better or worse (my money’s certainly on the latter), myriad aspects of EU citizens’ lives. Yet it has been met by a wall of silence in both the mainstream and social media.
Instead, what we are likely to see in the months ahead is a sudden explosion of Trojan Horse initiatives aimed at instilling the need for digital identity wallets for a host of common everyday activities or services, whether accessing porn websites or, as in India, receiving State benefits. As with the vaccine certificate, the goal is to achieve as broad an uptake in as short a time as possible. The government of Greece recently provided a hint of how that might be achieved: by making access to certain public services and spaces — in this case, sports stadiums — contingent on possession of a digital ID wallet.
Another (presumably intended) result of this is that it forces people, regardless of age or capability, to carry a smartphone app in order to access sport events. From the Greek government’s official ticketing website (machine translated):
We Are Returning to the Pitches Digitally and Safely!
From April 9, 2024, the Gov.gr Wallet, the Digital Wallet we have on our mobile phone, will be the necessary “tool” for every sports fan who wants to follow his favorite team. The way fans enter stadiums and stadiums throughout the country will now be done through the Gov.gr Wallet…
Based on the Joint Ministerial Decision of the Deputy Minister of Sports Yiannis Vroutsis and the Minister of Digital Governance Dimitris Papastergiou, the new way of entering the stadiums with the Gov.gr Wallet ticket will come into effect from April 9, 2024.
However, at the request of Sports Associations and Clubs, in order to be properly prepared and to give the necessary adaptation time to the fans, it will be possible to enter the stadiums, both in the way that was done prior to April 9, as well as with the ticket in Gov.gr Wallet, until the end of the current season.
Of course, this policy directly contradicts the Commission’s repeated assurances that the digital identity wallet is purely optional and that EU citizens will not face exclusion or discrimination for not using one. Yet as I document in my book, Scanned, digital identity is all about exclusion. The roughly 100 million Indian citizens that do not have the government-sanctioned Aadhaar number are excluded from government welfare programs as well as a host of other basic services.
Speaking at an event this week on “Governing in the Age of AI”, organised by his own TBI foundation, Tony Blair, one of the world’s most vocal advocates of digital surveillance and control technologies, described Digital ID as “an essential part of a modern digital infrastructure.” He then added, to peals of laughter from the audience, that “we will have a little work of persuasion to do here.”
Tony Blair on "Digital ID is an essential part of a modern digital infrastructure […] Although, we have a little work of persuasion to do here!" https://t.co/XXGXivHnXv pic.twitter.com/SQ2JwqqexM
— Tim Hinchliffe (@TimHinchliffe) July 9, 2024
Of course, the word Blair was actually thinking of here (but didn’t say, for obvious reasons) is “coercion,” not persuasion, since “persuasion” suggests that the people receiving the message will have a choice about whether or not to act on it. That will not be the case here, for the simple reason that the mass roll out of digital identity in ostensibly liberal democracies can only by achieved by coercing, or (in the vernacular of today’s governing classes) “nudging”, people into grudgingly accepting something that many of them instinctively recoil from.
Lastly, there will inevitably be those who say that if you’ve got nothing to hide, you’ve got nothing to worry about — a farcical argument that is unlikely to convince the untold millions of Spanish adult users of online porn. But even those who cling to the notion that they have absolutely nothing to hide from government authorities still have something to worry about regarding the government’s digital identity plans: the security of their most personal data, including their biometric identifiers.
Put simply, the government and the corporations they will subcontract out to cannot be trusted to keep all of this additional data safe. In recent weeks, Spain’s Directorate General of Traffic (DGT), which, among other things, handles the processing of driving licenses, was the victim of a data breach that resulted in the personal and vehicle information of more than 34 million drivers — equating to roughly three out of four Spanish citizens — being put up for sale online. Welcome to the Internet of compromised things, where just about everything is hackable!
34 comments
Comments are closed.
IANAL, but putting my couch lawyer wannabe cap on, if this were Canada I would mount a challenge to this on the grounds that this is religiously motivated and imposes religion on others. I think my odds of winning would be pretty good. The counter argument would be there is no limit imposed as shown by allowing adults 30 passes. My counter to that would be only religion would want to impose limits on sexuality.
Further, the anonymity argument fails. Any mechanism to track number of visits would necessarily keep count, which means it will necessarily list the sites visited. This also cannot be anonymous if said mechanism would also need to be set it up on the site which means the government would need to approve and categorize the site, which means some sites won’t receive approval due to their content (kink? BDSM? gay porn?) and it also won’t be long before they put limits on depiction of fellatio.
And then of course it won’t be long before the same argument is extended to non-porn sites for political reasons. It’ll start with obviously offensive sites, perhaps white supremacist sites, but then will scope and mission creep to include others not offensive.
‘The wallet can be used to store people’s surnames, first names, dates and place of birth, gender, or nationality as well as enable Europeans to identify themselves online.’
For a hacker, a database that includes all that info is one helluva honey pot and would also be for State actors. But if it got leaked, there could be some very important people getting embarrassed. That is what happened when the database for Grindr got released a few years ago which showed a few Washington names on that list. This all seems familiar as Microsoft was touting the idea twenty years or more ago that everybody should be forced to have a digital passport in order to use the internet. Perhaps this is the end game for those globalists – that to use the internet, you MUST have a digital wallet or it is a no go. It would certainly help in isolating dissidents (‘I’m sorry Mr. Assange – your access to the internet has been revoked when we shut down your digital wallet’) and the end goal is to restrict and control the flow of information. Don’t know how that Spanish idea will work out though. Maybe there should be a mocking campaign to demand of the Spanish government that they either open up access to pron or else supply a willing partner.
re: a mocking campaign:
like “Santorum”, back in the day…but is that even possible anymore?
“first, they came for the wankers….”
i say fine…i’ll just obtain a harem, somehow….
In the immortal words of my spouse, who said this immediately after I read aloud your comment, “If first they come for the wankers, there won’t be anyone left.:’
In a recent survey, about 90% of men and women admitted to masturbating. The other 10% were determined to be liars.
The Rev Kev
I have never, not even once in my life, masturbated. So the liar group must be 10% minus one. I have, however, been a lifelong master baiter.
@wilroncanada
I used to debate people in mathematics. Does that make me a maths debater?
If it didn’t include activity history (which it shouldn’t) then all it would show is that you signed up for the service. Yes, there is some personally identifiable information there and potential for harm if it was compromised, but it’s nothing that probably isn’t stored on plenty of other services. The usual security and privacy considerations would apply.
It’s a pity we can’t have a genuine attempt to solve this problem that isn’t a Trojan horse for control or tracking of adults. Some kind of agreed world-wide open standard and an opt-in mechanism would seem like the most promising approach. The signs of self-education via porn are everywhere if you can see them – stuff that was considered fringe behavior decades ago becoming normalized for everyone, including some potentially dangerous activities which people try without proper understanding or precautions (choking was one that came up in the Grace Millane case). Although it’s arguably more a sex education problem than a porn problem, and stepping up with a serious attempt at that would probably do more good.
Ruling elites have a genuine attempt to solve a problem of self-education via porn, by putting pedophiles in schools (which used to be limited to Catholics) and sexual parades on streets. After seeing people empyting their bladders on each other on the streets of San Francisco, and rear end sex lessons from drag queen in preschool, no child will be shocked by choking or squirting.
Debauchery is what declining empires are all about. The story of Sodom and Gomorrah can only have a happy ending of a massage parlour variety.
P.S. Porn becoming more extreme is not accidental, but part of the Brave New World. Recently I’ve read somewhere about people from the inside of Internet porn industry saying that more LGBT porn is intentionally pushed onto people (and, consequentially, kids) in an attempt to make more people LGBT. Who knows how many honest wanks were ruined by stuff like that popping up right in the middle of business.
Please. Keep your homophobic, “attempt to make more people LGBT” and particularly the “kids.”
Not really sure what the purpose of Naked Capitalisms monitoring of comments is even for if this unsubstantiated rubbish is allowed. When stuff like this gets through a monitored comment section I know I can’t trust the site.
I guess the Spanish Inquisition is no longer as unexpected as it used to be, since this surprised no one.
But no-one expects the Spanish Inquisition-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqreRufrkxM (34 secs)
perfect!
Pornographic notes and observations:
I note (with interest) that José Luis Escrivá, Minister of Digital Peeping, has the same surname as Josemaria Escrivá, founder of the execrable and body-hating Opus Dei. The surname isn’t all that common, so I will call out the similarity. Is the family business making other people miserable?
I am skeptical of the idea that young people are harmed irreparably by pornography—and that they get their sexual ideas from pornography. There is plenty of sex and violence in manga. Only a few readers of manga eventually believe that they have the sexuality of a fox spirit.
Unless “critics” plan to present real proofs of harm, I will remain agnostic. Rises in assault more likely have economic causes.
“Pornography” has been around as long as human beings have made representations on cave walls, pots, mirror handles, and tanned hides. The question always has been: Just what is pornography? No one knows.
For years and years, U.S. feminists insisted that Barbie distorted little girls’ understanding of their bodies. All little girls, you see, would believe that they would grow up to be 46 “ 20 “ 36 “. Now, Barbie is a feminist icon, and U.S. women are in a wave of obesity (which has much to do with economics and lack of regulation of the quality of food and little to do with porno).
A highly amusing practice in Italy, where every museum seems to have dozens and dozens of Greek and Etruscan vases on display, is to turn the sexy side to the back of the display case. One learns to peek. But is it pornography that the Greeks painted an image at the center of a wine kylix that portrays two men fondling each other?
Who draws the line? Not governments, I’d venture. Which is to say: I agree with Nick Corbishley that the government is exploiting something the many people find “icky,” pornography, to use new technology to monitor citizens. This is one more instance of new technology pressed into service where it shouldn’t be.
It’s like self-checkout. It’s like AI. What problem is being solved? None is. But the surveillance state can more readily be expanded through cameras at checkouts and counting clicks at AI. And monitoring OnlyFans.
> “Pornography” has been around as long as human beings have made representations on cave walls, pots, mirror handles, and tanned hides.
Question: When archaeologists describe figurines like the Venus de Milo as “fetish objects,” is that polite code?
The last I have seen it in Louvre, Venus of Milo was a full size sculpture (somewhat larger than real life). OTH, after visiting the art museum of Ottawa, I purchased to volumes on ancient Attic pottery, one black figured and one red figured. And the depiction include satires, nymphs and a lot more, including implicit LGBT content. That alleviates the problem of having vases presented from some directions only…
D’oh — I meant Venus of Willendorf.
As you point out the Spanish or in future the Europeans will be able to simply go to American porn sites or maybe Russian porn sites etc. So it’s really just a scam to sign up the lightly informed to a digital ID but won’t regulate anything. Lately I’ve noticed that stores like Target are heavily pushing store apps that require registration including a (no doubt traceable) phone number. For that matter social sites like Facebook have long been thought to be privacy harvesters where users open up their private lives in exchange for some free personal promotion.
And now we are told that Facebook censors that promotion if it conflicts with certain approved narratives. And yet the world knows in an instant that Biden is senile. Mind control is hard and all the cries of “disinformation” merely encourage the public to believe the opposite and seek out the forbidden fruit. This is called the Streisand Effect.
When governments start regulating what we can buy or where we can go then we’ll be back to the “passports please” era of the mid 20th. But here’s suggesting the totalitarians are going to find the internet a tougher nut to crack.
The first place this will get used en-masse is to shut down Spanish protest against the Gaza war. No I am not making a joke.
“…The real motive here, I believe, is not to protect children from the insidious effects of online porn; it is to begin the process of launching digital identity wallets for widespread public use…”
That’s it in a nutshell right there. We should respond with “piss off you t*ssers” (come se dice en espanol?)
Like just about everything in US/UK/EU politics: it’s a thinly disguised ploy to take away rights, scam the public, and kleptocratize. I know “kleptocratize” is not normally used as a verb but it seems to work very well.
Speaking of using asterisks: I want to design some t-shirts that say “F*ck the Oligarchy” but I just need to come up with some graphics to accompany the text. Maybe an image of a guillotine or instruments of Spanish Inquisition torture devices.
Coming soon: suppressing protests against conscription aiming to provide bodies for the Eastern Front. During WWII, it was voluntary in Spain…
This resembles the US push to scan IDs in for porn and similar sites to grant access, pushed by the Religious Right.
Yeah, ’cause they believe Jesus said to stone the harlot, mass murder the Samaritans, and scam the poor to raise money. but I don’t recall reading that in the bible.
After reading this: “During the presentation of the new digital wallet, the minister pointed out that “the vast majority of young people between 18 and 26 years of age see internet porn as a faithful representation of sexual intercourse.””
It made me think that every adult video should start with an FBI-esque warning that reads something like: “It is known to the state of California that this video is not a faithful representation of sexual intercourse.”
There should be warnings that some of the positions are frankly acrobatic and need people to be quite athletic and flexible, so there is a real risk of physical injury if you try this at home. Especially anything on ledges or stairs or heights and the edges of soft couches. And anal, if you just do it without gently phasing into it there’s gonna be tearing and blood and trips to hospitals. There should also be conversations with teens that modern porn doesn’t tend to depict emotional connection or intimacy, at all, rather unlike a lot of 70’s porn which kinda did, at least there were some that pretended to be romance stories….
Actually, porn, like everything else digital, is enshittified and becoming more so, for the same reasons music is, and there should be warning labels for that too. Learning about sex from porn is like asking a circus clown to teach you to drive.
Porn should be starting conversations, banning or limiting it is just going to prevent the necessary and good conversations.
Or “This material is not realistic representation of consensual intimacy according to the experts of the State of California because …”, our poor youth should see some positive examples too…
I don’t like the described scheme but I am in favour of taxing vices such as alcohol and tobacco. I would tax porn by requiring ISPs to offer base internet packages that have the porn filtered out, and more expensive internet packages that unfiltered access to everything.
I would imagine that most families would go for the filtered internet. Kids will still get around such restrictions but it will be much less available to them.
“When the Internet user tries to access it, the page in question will be able to check their age through this verification system by reading a QR code.”
A QR code? That alone makes me think the whole idea is a joke. A technology that has found its most sophisticated use in bringing up an online menu at a restaurant is probably not the one to turn to when attempting to securely validate a (supposedly) anonymous person.
Everything old is new again.
I predict a revival of Vivid Entertainment DVDs in plain brown envelopes.
I’m glad I saved my DVD porn collection
What is surprise me is not that government will use this as excuse to suppresses people on the net it’s people who are talking we should regulate the net but not this way. Internet 2000 to 2010 was perfect but when the government saw the internet educating the public so they bring their heavy gun out porn.
Good comments. I just want to emphasize that almost every time people start bloviating “what about the children,” terrorism, hate-speech, or “Our Democracy™️,” it is about control be it emotionally, mentally, or physically.
What is being offered here is no different than the TSA’s security theater in airports or the various security theaters elsewhere. Creating FUD or fear, uncertainty, and doubt and then imposing various actions supposedly to keep us all “safe,” which really makes more controllable.
All this said, I am not a fan of things like the Folsom Street Fair or other similar activities. We do have a problem with morality in our unmoored society.
Apropos of nothing, I was having dinner with some British coin dealers @ the big coin show of the year-the ANA show in Cincinnati in the early 1980’s and being barely an adult, adored a forbidden term such as wanker, as nobody knew what it meant in the USA, and as luck would have it our waitress that night was from merry olde, and I kept mentioning it in front of the waitress, and my fellow numismatists were turning beet red from embarrassment, too funny.
this is so ominous and important because it shows that there is a WEF blueprint that is being implemented to restrict every aspect of our lives and different countries are trialing different elements of it. For all their recognition of a state of Palestine, the Spanish Government is ultimately still just a business unit or subsidiary of the WEF. The Venn diagram of the WEF and supporters of the Genocide is an almost perfect circle, which tells me that the Spanish opposition is purely cosmetic.
And all the other EU and commonwealth nations will also be implementing the same programmes. America, corporate HQ, will probably be the last and most difficult to put in place because it has the strongest constitutional guarantees.
This digital identity wallet won’t just be used to restrict our activities, something insiduous in its own right, but to force us to do things we would never agree to such as conscription into war.
My take is that the Davos elite really are terrified of climate change and, instead of curbing their own lifestyles, they have opted for depopulation as their remedy. Who said the cure can’t be worse than the disease?