Israel Assassinates Hamas Negotiator, Ismail Haniyeh, in Iran, Leading to Condemnation Across Muslim World; Israel Attempts Assassination of Hezbollah Leader in Beirut; Settler Brownshirt Rampage Against IDF Wins Knesset Backing

As the Daily Mail-ish headline suggests, the political and military situation in Israel and environs has become overly dynamic, in a bad way. We’ll try to be spare given that the members of the Axis of Resistance are almost certainly considering retaliatory measures against Israel, as well as how to deal with the US.

An overview from CNN:

Haniyeh had been in Tehran for the inauguration of Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, and was staying in a residence for veterans in the north of the city, state-affiliated news outlet Fars reported.

At around 2 a.m. local time, an “airborne guided projectile” targeted where Haniyeh was staying, according to Iranian state-run outlet IRNA which said his bodyguard was also killed.

IRNA said further investigations are underway to determine the details of the operation and the position from where the projectile was fired.

And a visual:

Even though Israel has not taken credit for the killing of Ismail Haniyeh, pretty much everyone with an operating brain cell thinks Israel was responsible. It’s not as if there are a lot of other candidates who have both the means and the motive, particularly since Israel has taken a victory lap for earlier attacks on Haniyeh’s family. Military Watch has not only fingered Israel as the perp but also identified an F-35 as the probable instrument in From Israeli Attack Kills Hamas Leader in Tehran: F-35 Precision Strike Suspected.

Even though it can’t yet be proven, the assassination attempts took place right after Netanyahu’s visit to the US, and also likely had US intelligence/targeting support. And even without the provocative timing, one would expect the US to have its hand in these actions.

Killing a top Hamas official in Iran is clearly intended to drag Iran into the conflict in an open manner, since as many experts have pointed out, Israel sees no way out of the mess it has gotten itself into absent the US coming to its rescue. Yet it seems highly unlikely that head of the Joint Chiefs Charles Brown was misleading Israel when he warned that the US really could not do much to help, particularly given that that sort of message would go over badly among the many bought and paid for AIPAC stooges in the Beltway.

As we stress in the headline, and oddly nearly all press accounts either omit completely or bury, Ismail Haniyeh was not just a top member of Hamas’ political wing, but a (the?) lead negotiator in the peace talks. From Qatar’s official statement on the killing from prime minister and minister of foreign affairs, Sheikh Mohammed bin Jassim Al Thani , courtesy Middle East Eye:

The approach of political assassinations and intentional escalation against civilians in Gaza at every stage of the negotiation prompts the question: How can negotiations take place in which one party kills its negotiator at the same time? Regional and international peace needs serious partners and an international stance against escalation and disregard for the lives of the peoples of the region.

In case you doubt Qatar’s claim, from a Reuters report last November:

Ismail Haniyeh, the Hamas leader based in Qatar, has been the tough-talking face of the Palestinian group’s international diplomacy as war has raged back in Gaza where his family home was destroyed in an Israeli air strike in November.

Appointed to the militant group’s top job in 2017, he has moved between Turkey and Qatar’s capital Doha, escaping the travel restrictions of the blockaded Gaza Strip and enabling him to act as a negotiator in the latest ceasefire deal

The Israelis were very much out to punish Hamiyeh, confirming they successfully targeted his boys in April:

In addition to the statements at Middle East Eye from Iran, Qatar, Hezbollah, Jordan, Türkiye, Yemen, Malaysia, Afghanistan, and China condemning the assassination, an Anadolu Agency story adds the Lebanese government, Pakistan, and Russia. The Jakarta Post features a critical statement from Egypt (but none from Indonesia). The Times of India reports that Iraq depicted the killing as a “flagrant violation of international law” and quotes Syria “Syria condemns this blatant Zionist aggression…[a] despicable act”. So as far as I can tell, the only major Muslim countries holding their tongues are Indonesia and Egypt.

From Iran’s perspective, an attack within its national borders, and of a foreign guest, is in some ways worse than the Israel strike on Iran’s embassy grounds in Damascus that killed members of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard. Recall then that Iran agreed with the US to engage in a controlled retaliation. Iran identified its targets, which were exclusively military. This was the infamous 300 drone attack, which were designed to flush out information about Israeli (and supporting US and French air defenses) with cruise and ballistic missiles following. Not only did Iran penetrate the Israeli defenses and hit what were supposedly some of the best protected spots in Israel, but colleague with diplomatic contacts said that the airbase that Iran hit had two airstrips, and Iran landed missiles in the dead center of each to demonstrate their precision capabilities. And these were not Iran’s most advanced missiles.

To add insult to injury, the cost of the Israel-Western missiles expended in this defensive operation was over $2 billion, while the cost of the Iran attack was under $100 million.

So Israel appears to be hewing to the definition of insanity attributed to Einstein: doing the same thing again and expecting a different result.

There are many tweets, nearly all with no retweets, from early July along these lines:

Scott Ritter, who has gone from being a friend of Israel to a very loud critic, particularly of its supposed military prowess, has repeatedly dismissed the US aircraft carrier threat display. He says they can transport 1200 Marines, but if they were to actually try to Do Anything, “They will all die.”. Ritter has not bothered unpacking why a mission would be a disaster, but he seems to think this is so obvious as to not be worth explaining (note that Ritter does often go into current and historical Middle East military nerdery). So this measure appears to be a combo plate of threat supply plus additional air support.

Yet we have Tony Blinken continuing with his intelligence-insulting prattle. Is he genuinely this stupid or is he relying on the Western media not bothering to mention that Haniyeh was a key negotiator? Oh, and that Israel killing him is yet more proof that Israel is committed to its Palestinian extermination/ethnic cleansing project? From the Times of India:

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Wednesday that a ceasefire in Gaza was “imperative” after the killing of Hamas’s political leader Ismail Haniyeh in Iran.

Blinken refused to comment directly on the killing of Haniyeh but said at a forum in Singapore that reaching a ceasefire in Gaza “is the enduring imperative”.

“We’ve been working from day one not only to try to get to a better place in Gaza but also to prevent the conflict from spreading, whether it’s the north with Lebanon and Hezbollah, whether it’s the Red Sea with the Houthis, whether it’s Iran, Syria, Iraq, you name it,” Blinken said.

“A big key to trying to make sure that that doesn’t happen, and that we can move to a better place, is getting the ceasefire.”

Now to the assassination attempt in Beirut of senior Hezbollah commander Faoud Shakr. Israel claimed it had killed him but it is not clear they succeeded:

And an image:

More persuasively, USA Today reported:

Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah responded to Tuesday’s airstrike in a statement on social media. “Your assassination attempt has failed,” Nasrallah said, adding in a separate message that “an official statement in response will be issued by the Islamic Resistance as soon as all facts are taken into account.”

The colleague with diplomatic contacts told me he had heard that Shakr had been injured but survived.

The Financial Times described how civilians died and many were injured:

Lebanon’s state-run National News Agency said the Israeli strike on Beirut on Tuesday, carried out with a drone that launched three rockets, had targeted the area around Hizbollah’s governing Shura Council in the densely populated Haret Hreik neighbourhood, a stronghold of the militant group.

A large explosion ripped through the area, with television footage showing several floors of a residential building badly damaged and large plumes of smoke. At least three people were killed — a woman and two children — and a further 74 people were injured, some critically, the Lebanese health ministry said.

Keep in mind that Israel’s justification is strained. Hezbollah took credit for attacking a military base in the Golan Heights, which by the way is disputed territory; Israel has occupied it since . Israel claimed that Hezbollah hit a schoolyard, which killed 12 children, and that legitimates the strike into Beirut.

First, Hezbollah does not target civilians. They have better things to do with their rockets. Second, Hezbollah pointed out if it had targeted the schoolyard, there would be a crater, as opposed to shrapnel. And there was no crater.

So the far more likely explanation is that an Israeli air defense weapon hit one of the Hezbollah missiles and it was the fallout that struck the schoolyard.

Third, it was Syrian children that died. Since when does Israel harbor such concern for non-Jews?

One has to wonder what madness has overtaken Israel’s government and much of its society, to think that attacking Hezbollah and Iran are national-security advancing strategies. The IDF resistance and no doubt numerous and pointed private warnings don’t appear to have penetrated the Zionist sense of entitlement.

And speaking of madness, the Knesset has defended the right to ass rape prisoners. The IDF was set to try some soldiers who had abused a detainee to the point of inflicting severe internal injuries. Settlers stormed the IDF garrison to free the soldiers. This video not only summarizes that incident but reports that settlers went to another IDF military court to again try to stop any punishment of sadistic soldiers.

The row quickly wound up before the Knesset. Twitter has many clips of the sordid debate, with representatives overwhelmingly and loudly supporting torture. The unsurprising result:

Yesterday Moon of Alabama in Israel Might Well Fall Apart depicted this internal conflict as a potential civil war triggered by a power struggle between Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant and Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir. Ben-Gvir controls the police. I recall reading many many years ago (perhaps in the Economist?) of how the IDF would try to restrain the settlers in persecuting the Palestinians only to have the police back their conduct. So this conflict has deep roots.

However, the trajectory may not be to civil war. With the settlers and police now acting as brownshirts, Israel is on its way to becoming an open fascist state. With nukes. And the US will have enabled that outcome by refusing to impose even minor constraints on Israel’s ever more horrific behavior.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

27 comments

  1. furnace

    Great post. Frankly the chaos in “Israeli” society is reaching terminal levels, amidst the earlier discussion of the economic catastrophe currently unfolding, and this mutiny over the right to rape prisoners (has there ever been such a deranged society? Even the nazi scum mostly hid their crimes in Eastern territories, and pretended to have a veneer of “civilization”). This is the only good news.

    Haniyeh’ martyrdom, though a blow to Hamas, is by no means fatal; they have lost senior leaders time and time again, and always managed to become even stronger. But it is a terrible mark on Iran, which I entirely agree: this is much worse than the embassy attack (which was pretty bad already). To kill a guest during a presidential inauguration in the capital of a country is essentially just an open declaration of war, no ifs, ands, or buts. Iran will respond with prejudice, and I suspect that if the 300 drones earlier this year gave the “Israelis” and their Western cheerleaders so much trouble, an actual, forceful, gloves-off attack will be cataclysmic for the country. This, of course, without mentioning that Yemen still owes some payback, as well as Hezbollah.

    “Israel’s” situation more and more recalls the desperate götterdämmerung of 44-45. I pray that this vile entity will end soon. God willing.

    Reply
  2. The Rev Kev

    If the Iranians are thinking of targeting a particular place in Israel, I would nominate the Knesset building in Tel Aviv. It is a large complex that appears to be semi-isolated and it is not that old so it’s loss would be architecturally important. Losses would be limited at night to security guards and cleaners but as the Israelis do not give a rats how many people they kill, it would be only fair. Even it’s partial destruction would be an absolute humiliation for the government though most Israelis would be thinking that at least it was not us. Certainly even the Israelis could not hide this happening and would make international news though the Democrats might try to argue that it was not directly hit but was hit by bullet, errr, missile fragments. And is the US government really going to take the country to war over a 60 year-old building being hit?

    As for Scott Ritter’s point about how those 1,200 US Marines would die, I think that he has a point. That is only a about a battalion’s worth. So where would they be deployed? Would they go fight in the streets and tunnels of Gaza? Would they try to help Israel invade Lebanon? Who is going to provide in either case their air support? What about the vehicular firepower to back them up? How will logistics keep them supplied on operations. Are they sure that the Israelis would not do a USS Liberty on them and try to make out that it was Hamas or Hezbollah or Iran or even the Russians that attacked them?

    Reply
    1. Benny Profane

      Somehow they would have to disperse out into very small groups, maybe integrate into the IDF (hoo boy) in order not to be a target, all positioned together and sleeping together, like when the Marine barracks were hit almost forty years ago. But this time the “terrorists” don’t need suicide truck bombs, they have precision missiles. They’d be an even easier target on that incoming ship. Even the Houtis would say, pfft, hold my beer.

      Reply
  3. ciroc

    I thought that IDF soldiers have all kinds of rights, and that raping prisoners is one of them, so I was surprised that they were suddenly taken into custody. After all, in the religious philosophy of the Israelis, bombing children is acceptable, but sodomy is still a vice?

    Reply
    1. Yves Smith Post author

      I failed to excerpt the explanation at Moon of Alabama (I didn’t copy over the links to the underlying stories but he has them):

      The Israeli investigation of the rape became necessary after reports by CNN, the New York Times (archived) and the Washington Post (archived) about prisoner abuse and murder in Israeli jails. The reports threatened to trigger international investigations:

      Judicial officials told Ynet that the serious suspicions must be investigated. “An internal Israeli investigation is better than an international probe,” the said.

      “Abuse of prisoners could cause unprecedented damage internationally. Internal investigations protect Israel from the International tribunals in the Hague. If we do not investigate, we are ensuring the political and military leaders end up before those courts and Israel subjected to grave steps. The suspects were detained for questioning and not arrested. They will receive a fair and just due process.”

      Lawyers for the suspected reservists denied the accusations of rape and said the prisoner refused a search when he was moved to the Sde Teiman facility and was restrained by force.

      https://www.moonofalabama.org/2024/07/israel-might-well-fall-apart.html#more

      Reply
      1. ciroc

        I don’t think Israel is taking the possibility of an international investigation seriously. It should be able to reject or ignore it, as it did the arrest warrant against Netanyahu.

        Reply
  4. Mikel

    Israel won’t fall apart as long as the Muslims of various countries are divided and their leaders/elite have large financial interests (personal ones) in the West. If Israel gets away with this ethnic cleansing, don’t talk to me about how “isolated” Israel is.
    An awakening about the West on the level that Putin is having would be needed.

    Reply
    1. furnace

      I think you underestimate “Israel’s” capacities to destroy itself. Of course, it would be faster if the Arab world were united, but by this point this “country” is barely hanging together on its own terms (remember, before Oct. 7th it was already in a terrible crisis).

      Reply
      1. Mikel

        The Western elite, despite all trials and tribulations, have unity – Israel is a part of that.
        They see a world of people they consider inferior. And that world view is stronger than their arguments and fights over the spoils of conquests.

        Reply
        1. Yves Smith Post author

          Huh? Have you not been paying attention to UN Security Council votes? The only supporter of Israel is the US. On May 10, in a full Assembly vote, only 9 members opposed Palestine becoming a full member. Yes, that vote was symbolic, but it tells you where sentiment lies, and it is NOT with the genocidal Zionist state.

          Reply
          1. Mikel

            I remember the articles about that.
            And then I see reports of the war expanding and body count increasing.

            Reply
        2. mrsyk

          I’ll push back, just a little. Agree with the “unity”, up to a point. I’d wager the “elite” you refer to will eventually act like rats they are and abandon a sinking ship. About that “awakening” (a good point), isn’t it taking place?
          IMO, the only reason Israel still exists is nuclear deterrent.

          Reply
    2. Benny Profane

      I would like to see the numbers for emigration in the past seven months. I have read that the economy is falling apart, with the citizen army occupying most employees lives, and many businesses basically bankrupt. The tech start up economy has fled.

      Reply
  5. gcw919

    “Yet we have Tony Blinken continuing with his intelligence-insulting prattle. Is he genuinely this stupid or is he relying on the Western media not bothering to mention that Haniyeh was a key negotiator?”

    Its a toss-up.

    Reply
  6. ISL

    Han Solo in the Death Star: “I have a bad feeling about this,” trapped in a room with shrinking walls – a fit policy metaphor.

    Israel clearly got the green light it felt it needed from Netanyahu’s imperial visit to the US (complete with US politico kow-towing) to start a war with Iran (and Hezbollah), and its hard to see anything (save an EMP over Israel) that stops the train (heading for the cliff).

    Meanwhile, a drone took off from Finland and destroyed a Russian Strategic bomber (per MacGregor, on Redacted). I suppose a drone could take off from Khmeimim and heavily damage a US ship in the Med.

    Reply
  7. voislav

    I would agree that probability of civil war or internal conflict in Israel is close to zero. Population at large as well as IDF rank and file largely support the brutal treatment of Palestinians and it’s indicative that the concerns voiced by the military leaders were not related to well-being of Palestinians but to criminal prosecution in international courts.

    Israelis who had concerns about the conduct of the war and direction of the country have largely voted with their feet instead, making the country more extreme and less divided.

    Reply
    1. thoughtfulperson

      This seems about right. Would be interesting to know how many have departed. I recall reading 500,000 somewhere. Per wikipedia there are about 10 million living in Isreal with 21% arab. Thus about 8million. 500 thousand is around 1/8th of the entire non-arab population which seems fairly significant. And I heard that a month or two ago. I suspect the departures have continued.

      Reply
  8. David in Friday Harbor

    Yet another Revisionist Zionist war crime perpetrated with American weaponry — in this case a stand-off F-35 jet. But none of these war crimes could be perpetrated without the foreknowledge and support of the U.S. government — and in particular the current Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

    Blinken is not stupid. He is an arrogant, condescending, a**hole. He is the silver-spoon son of Don Blinken, co-founder of Warburg Pincus. He was raised by his mother in Paris and attended an exclusive private lycée. Daddy Don brought him back as an undergrad and bought him Democrat foreign policy sinecures before he had even graduated Harvard.

    I remain convinced that Blinken’s world-view was formed by being punked daily for his lunch money by the jeunes arabes of the cités. His entire career appears to be based on cooking-up schemes to kill arabs — particularly in Libya, Syria, and Palestine. Like Himmler, Blinken seduces with his milquetoast appearance, but he is truly and murderously evil.

    The U.S. has its fingerprints all over this outrageous war crime. It will not surprise me if the Islamic Republic exacts its revenge against an American target rather than risk provoking the Sicarii of Masada into slinging their nukes in an act of self-immolation. Then we will be all be mocked by the American expressions of shock.

    Reply
  9. Socal Rhino

    When questioned by a reporter about rape of prisoners being criminal, State Department spokesman Patel said he wasn’t a legal expert.

    Reply
  10. .Tom

    > With the settlers and police now acting as brownshirts, Israel is on its way to becoming an open fascist state. With nukes. And the US will have enabled that outcome by refusing to impose even minor constraints on Israel’s ever more horrific behavior.

    Not to mention US Congressional representatives and senators giving a world record performance of standing Os just a few days ago to the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu.

    Reply
  11. JonnyJames

    The unvarnished ugly truth: rape, torture, murdering children, decomposing bodies and body parts of women and children, murdering medical doctors, bombing hospitals, schools, targeting journalists (I lost count, but well over 100 journalists have been murdered by Israel in Gaza in the last 8 months or so). These atrocities must rank among the most horrific in history, and they are happening right now – subsidized by the US gov. No money for health care crisis, infrastructure crisis, housing crisis, etc. but plenty of US public resources for torture, rape and genocide. Land of the…home of the….

    The Golan Heights is Syrian territory, occupied by Israel, this is not disputed; The DT regime recognized it as Israeli and the JB regime continues that policy. The rest of the world, as far as I know, recognizes Golan as Syrian. But international law is irrelevant at the moment when we have state-sanctioned torture, rape, ethnic cleansing and genocide all approved, funded and enabled by imperial officials in Warshiton. The rule of law, human rights and any sense of human decency are pissed on every day in full view of the world. We see in full view, every day, that only brute violence and death rules.

    The US has directly destroyed entire countries, resulting in the deaths of many 100s of thousands, even millions, of innocent people (Iraq, Libya, Syria etc.) Before that The US carpet bombed Korea then later carpet bombed SE Asia (dropping more bombs than in all of WWII, more than double).

    No one has been held to account for the pack of lies that led up to the Iraq war (Scott Ritter exposed the truth about the non-existent WMD). In this latest atrocity, the US gov can hide behind Israel and claim it was not their doing but at the end of the day, no one will be held to account by the US and vassals (the so-called West).

    So, when we hear our “elected leaders”, talk about human rights, law, democracy we can respond accordingly with some choice words and gestures.

    If humans survive, the history books of the future will not be kind: why did “good Americans” continue to “vote” for such evil, genocidal leaders? Were Americans inherently murderous and sadistic?

    Reply
    1. Polar Socialist

      Indonesian president is currently visiting Moscow. Maybe he’s waiting for the presser with Putin?

      Reply
  12. HH

    I think this is heading toward an Israeli nuclear attack on Iran. This would result ultimately, if not immediately, in a nuclear counter-strike, which would be the end of Israel. The self-destructive character of Israeli society will likely lead to a sad repetition of the historic debacle at the time of the Maccabees. A pathologically combative and fractious state cannot survive in the modern world.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *