Beijing and Washington Clash Over Russia Sanctions

Yves here. We’ve posting an article from US propaganda information outlet RFE/RFL below as a critical thinking exercise. The piece does wind up highlighting how US the US idea of diplomacy seems to equate to coercion. The US imposed yet more sanctions on China, of companies the US depicts as supporting Russia’s war in Ukraine, right before Jake Sullivan went to Beijing for a summit. That visit which included a meeting with President Xi Jinping.

Readers will note that the RFE/RFL account, consistent with the headline we have reproduced above, focuses on China not cooperating with US sanctions on Russia, which China correctly depicts as illegal (by virtue of not having been approved by the UN). It does not mention US economic sanctions on China, particularly on chips and EV tariffs, which look to be to be mainly to try to stymie Chinese development.

By contrast, the stories on the English language Chinese outlet, Global Times, don’t even dignify the US carping about Russia with a mention. That reflects the Chinese position that China’s dealing with other countries are none of the US’ business. See the article, US should view China’s devt in a rational light, Xi tells Sullivan and the editorial, Hope US will also use ‘three responsibilities’ to benchmark its actions, for confirmation. There is only an indirect reference in editorial, mention the sanctions and decrying “camp confrontation”

Some additional takes on the Sullivan visit:

By RFE/RL. Cross posted from OilPrice

  • The US imposed sanctions on Chinese firms believed to be supporting Russia’s war effort, leading to a diplomatic dispute ahead of Jake Sullivan’s visit to Beijing.
  • Sullivan’s trip aims to address a range of issues including tensions in the South China Sea, China’s cooperation with Russia, and the conflict in the Middle East.
  • Azerbaijan is strengthening ties with China through strategic partnerships and seeking membership in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICS group.

Beijing called recent U.S. sanctions on its companies over the Ukraine war “illegal and unilateral” and “not based on facts,” as White House national-security adviser Jake Sullivan arrived in China for several days of high-level talks.

Here’s what’s going on.

Finding Perspective: Washington has repeatedly warned Beijing over its support for Russia’s defense industrial base and has already issued hundreds of sanctions aimed at curbing Moscow’s ability to exploit certain technologies for military purposes.

The United States imposed sanctions on more than 400 entities and individuals for supporting Russia’s war effort in Ukraine on August 23, including Chinese firms that U.S. officials believe are helping Moscow skirt Western sanctions and build up its military.

One hundred and twenty-three entities were also added to the U.S. export control list known as the Entity List, which forces suppliers to obtain licenses before shipping to targeted companies. Among those added in this most recent batch, 63 entities were based in Russia and 42 in China.

On August 27, ahead of Sullivan’s arrival that same day, Li Hui, China’s special envoy for Eurasian affairs, who has done four rounds of shuttle diplomacy, criticized the sanctions at a briefing for diplomats in Beijing after the latest round of meetings with officials from Brazil, Indonesia, and South Africa.

China has been striving to present itself as a party that is actively looking for a solution to the war in Ukraine, despite skipping a key peace conference in Switzerland this June.

After past rounds of talks led by Li in the spring, Beijing put forward proposals on supporting the exchange of prisoners of war, opposing the use of nuclear and biological weapons, and opposing armed attacks on civilian nuclear facilities, as well as an outline for principles to end the war in February 2023.

Sullivan In China: Sullivan’s trip comes at a time of high tensions in the U.S.-China relationship, with issues like Taiwan, the war in Ukraine, and tensions in the South China Sea flaring up.

The trip is Sullivan’s fifth meeting with Foreign Minister Wang Yi, who is also the director of the Chinese Communist Party Central Committee Foreign Affairs Commission Office. As the Financial Times recently reported, both officials have been engaged in secret backchannel talks since 2023 following a low point in ties after an incident with a Chinese spy balloon flying over the United States.

The two officials are expected to discuss a litany of issues in Beijing, including tensions in the South China Sea, China’s growing cooperation with Russia, and conflict in the Middle East.

Why It Matters: Talks between Washington and Beijing are never easy and both sides have lots to talk about, but Russia and the war in Ukraine are high on the agenda.

When U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken visited Beijing in April, he warned that Washington would act if China did not stop supplying Russia with microchips and machine parts to build weapons used in Ukraine.

He also accused his Chinese counterparts of “helping to fuel the biggest threat” to European security since the Cold War.

Since then, Chinese companies have been hit with a raft of measures and the threat of further secondary sanctions on other Chinese entities have led to Chinese banks tightening their restrictions on payments from Russia.

Both Sullivan and Wang are hoping to set up a framework for stable relations between their two governments despite their laundry list of issues.

During comments about U.S.-China relations in January at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, Sullivan said that he and Wang continued to have “direct” conversations on leading issues, including Ukraine and Russia.

“”Both of us left feeling that we didn’t agree or see eye-to-eye on everything but that there was a lot of work to carry forward,” Sullivan .

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

6 comments

  1. Ignacio

    US foreign policy is in a one way road with no reverse gear. A reverse gear might be an important diplomatic tool. Or maybe at least a 4 wheeled drive to allow taking circuitous bends on the countryside to reach some common ground somewhere? Is US diplomacy like a gigantic truck on a highway to nowhere?

    Reply
  2. JohnA

    American ‘diplomats’ such as Sullivan and Blinken would do very well to heed the words of Robert Burns in the final verse of Ode to a Louse, namely:

    O wad some Power the giftie gie us
    To see oursels as ithers see us!
    It wad frae mony a blunder free us,
    An’ foolish notion:
    What airs in dress an’ gait wad lea’e us,
    An’ ev’n devotion!

    Reply
  3. The Rev Kev

    This is damning when you think about it. When Biden was only several weeks into office, they arranged to meet a Chinese delegation in Anchorage, Alaska and the Chinese hope was that the Trump sanctions would be wound back a bit and there would be some sort of detente arranged. Instead it almost ended in a shouting match as China pushed back against US demands to buckle down. Antony Blinken and Jake Sullivan were there it should be noted. And now with Biden on his way out of office you have the same sort of confrontational dialogues with the only difference being that the Biden White House demands that China starts to divorce themselves from Russia. The war is the excuse but if the war stopped tomorrow, the US would still demand this “divorce.” So after nearly four years we are right back full circle to where things started with US-Chinese relations and people like Sullivan did not learn a damned thing-

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States%E2%80%93China_talks_in_Alaska

    Looking at that photo of Sullivan and Xi shaking hands, I hope that Xi remembered to count his fingers afterwards.

    Reply
    1. Michael Hudson

      That is a GREAT picture of Sullivan and Xi. The latter has his usual frozen smile. But Sullivan looks like he’s just been badly (for him) put in his place, and is sulking.
      Sounds like it was a good meeting. :)-
      Maybe Xi suggested sanctioning the US beyond gallium, germanium and rare earths.

      Reply
  4. Guy Liston

    I see Xi who does clearly resemble an extremely indulgent parent and I see Sullivan, who most resembles your average sixth grader in a typical US elementary school. Who should you put your trust in? Mike Liston

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *