Yves here. While it might seem that Larry Summers has finally faded from public life, think again! Wikipedia reports that Summers joined the board of OpenAI in November 2023. And one can be sure he’d want to influence the economic policies of a Harris Administration, if not though a formal role, then though op-ed and back channels.
Keep in mind that Summers has one of the leaders of the hawkish view of our current inflation, which Americans have been dutifully told has been tamed, even if many are still suffering from higher prices. A snapshot of this views from 2022: History Shows No Example of Hiking US Rates Too Fast, Summers Says.
In fact, as Dutch economist Servaas Storm showed over several papers, carefully parsing data, our inflation is due largely if not entirely to a reduction in supply: the impact of Covid on the workforce and supply chains and sanctions blowback. Biden deficits may have come to play a role, but Summers’ notion that too much demand caused the inflation meant his call for Fed interest rate hikes was administering the wrong medicine.
So Mark Ames’ hardy perennial, which he wrote for our first fundraiser thirteen years ago, remains an important warning.
While this is our analogue to Christmas staples like The Grinch That Stole Christmas or It’s a Wonderful Life. Ames’ piece is the antithesis of sappy. Ames also explains one of the reasons the left is so bad at power: its adherents saw finance as grubby and thus not worth of study.
And in the spirit of Christmas coming early, we hope you’ll leave something nice in our stocking, um, Tip Jar!
By Mark Ames, author of Going Postal: Rage, Murder and Rebellion from Reagan’s Workplaces to Clinton’s Columbine.
If you’ve been reading Naked Capitalism for any period of time without giving back in donations—and most of us have been hooked from the time we discovered Yves Smith’s powerful, sharp voice and brilliant mind—then you you’ve been getting away with murder. Naked Capitalism is that rare blog that makes you smarter. Smarter about a lot of things, but primarily about Yves’ area of expertise, finance.
By a quirk of historical bad luck, the American Left has gone two generations without understanding finance, or even caring to understand. It was the hippies who decided half a century ago that finance was beneath them, so they happily ceded the entire field—finance, business, economics, money—otherwise known as “political power”—to the other side. Walking away from the finance struggle was like that hitchhiker handing the gun back to the Manson Family. There’s a great line from Charles Portis’s anti-hippie novel, “Dog of the South” that captures the Boomers’ self-righteous disdain for “figures”:
He would always say—boast, the way those people do—that he had no head for figures and couldn’t do things with his hands, slyly suggesting the presence of finer qualities.
That part about the hands—that would refer to the hippies’ other great failure, turning their backs on Labor, because Labor didn’t groove with the Hippies’ Culture War. So the Left finds itself, fifty years later, dealing with the consequences of all those years of ruinous neglect of finance and labor—the consequences being powerlessness and political impotence.
That’s why Yves Smith is so important to anyone who cares about politics and the bad direction this country is taking. In 2008, the Left suddenly discovered that although it could bray with the best of ‘em about how bad foreign wars are, and how wrong racism and sexism an homophobia are, it was caught completely and shamefully by surprise by the financial collapse of 2008. The ignorance was paralyzing, politically and intellectually. Even the lexicon was alien. Unless of course you were one of the early followers of Yves Smith’s blog.
It wasn’t always this way.
Back in the 1930s, the Left was firmly grounded in economics, money and finance; back then, the Left and Labor were practically one. With a foundation in finance and economics, the Left understood labor and political power and ideology and organization much better than the Left today, which at best can parry back the idiotic malice-flak that the Right specializes in spraying us with. We’re only just learning how politically stunted and ignorant we are, how much time and knowledge we’ve lost, and how much catching up we have to do.
Which is why Yves Smith’s Naked Capitalism is one of the 99%’s most valuable asset in the long struggle ahead: She is both analyst and educator, with a rare literary talent (especially for finance). One thing that’s protected the financial oligarchy is the turgid horrible prose that they camouflage their toxic ideas and concepts in. Yves is one of the rare few who can make reading finance as emotionally charged as it needs to be.
Naked Capitalism is our online university in finance and politics and ideology. Whereas other online universities are set up to turn millions of gullible youths into debt-shackled Wall Street feeding cows, Naked Capitalism is the opposite: Completely free, consistently brilliant, vital, and necessary, making us smarter, teaching us how we might one day overthrow the financial oligarchy. One other difference between Naked Capitalism and online university swindles: (Stanley Kaplan cough-cough!) Your donations won’t end up paying Ezra Klein’s salary.
Which brings me back to my whole “Shame on you!” point I was trying to make earlier. When it comes to fundraising, nothing works like shaming. That’s how those late-night commercials work: You’re sitting there in your nice comfortable home, and then suddenly there’s this three-legged dog hobbling into its cage, with big wet eyes, and then some bearded pedophile comes on and says, “Poor Rusty has endured more abuse and pain than you can ever imagine, and tomorrow, he will be gassed to death in a slow, horrible poison death chamber. And you—look at you, sitting there with your Chunky Monkey and your central heating, what kind of sick bastard are you? Get your goddamn Visa Mastercard out and send money to Rusty, or else his death is on your head. I hope you sleep well at night.”
Now I know that this sort of appeal wouldn’t work on the Naked Capitalism crowd—too many economists here, and as everyone knows, you can’t appeal to economists’ hearts because, well, see under “Larry Summers World Bank Memo”… I can imagine Larry watching that late night commercial with the three-legged dog, powering a 2-liter bottle of Diet Coke and devouring a bag of Kettle Salt & Vinegar potato chips, calculating the productive worth of the three-legged dog, unmoved by the sentimental appeal. Larry grabs a dictaphone: “Item: How to end dog-gassings? Solution: Ship all three-legged stray dogs to sub-Saharan Africa. Africans won’t even notice. Dogs saved. Private capital freed up. Problem solved.”
So some of you have no hearts, and some of us have no shame. But we all do understand how vital Naked Capitalism has been in educating us. I’m sure that the other side knows how dangerous a site like this is, because as we become more educated and more political, we become more and more of a threat.
The oligarchy has spent decades on a project to “defund the Left,” and they’ve succeeded in ways we’re only just now grasping. “Defunding the Left” doesn’t mean denying funds to the rotten Democratic Party; it means defunding everything that threatens the 1%’s hold on wealth and power.
One of their greatest successes, whether by design or not, has been the gutting of journalism, shrinking it down to a manageable size where its integrity can be drowned in a bathtub. It’s nearly impossible to make a living as a journalist these days; and with the economics of the journalism business still in free-fall like the Soviet refrigerator industry in the 1990s, media outlets are even less inclined to challenge power, journalists are less inclined to rock the boat than ever, and everyone is more inclined to corruption (see: Washington Post, Atlantic Monthly). A ProPublica study in May put it in numbers: In 1980, the ratio of PR flaks to journalists was roughly 1:3. In 2008, there were 3 PR flaks for every 1 journalist. And that was before the 2008 shit hit the journalism fan.
This is what an oligarchy looks like. I saw the exact same dynamic in Russia under Yeltsin: When he took power in 1991, Russia had the most fearless and most ideologically diverse journalism culture of any I’ve ever seen, a lo-fi, hi-octane version of American journalism in the 1970s. But as soon as Yeltsin created a class of oligarchs to ensure his election victory in 1996, the oligarchs snapped up all the free media outlets, and forced out anyone who challenged power, one by one. By the time Putin came to power, all the great Russian journalists that I and Taibbi knew had abandoned the profession for PR or political whoring. It was the oligarchy that killed Russian journalism; Putin merely mopped up a few remaining pockets of resistance.
The only way to prevent that from happening to is to support the best of what we have left. Working for free sucks. It can’t hold, and it won’t.
There are multiple ways to give. The first is here on the blog, the Tip Jar, which takes you to PayPal. There you can use a debit card, a credit card or a PayPal account (the charge will be in the name of Aurora Advisors).
You can also send a check (or multiple post dated checks) in the name of Aurora Advisors Incorporated to
Aurora Advisors Incorporated
PO Box 110105
Brooklyn NY 11211-0105
Please also send an e-mail to yves@nakedcapitalism.com with the headline “Check is in the mail” (and just the $ en route in the message) to have your contribution included in the running tally of donations.
So donate now to Naked Capitalism. If you can’t afford much, give what you can. If you can afford more, give more. If you can give a lot, give a lot. Whether you can contribute $5 or $5,000, it will pay for itself, I guarantee you. This isn’t just giving, it’s a statement that you are want a different debate, a different society, and a different culture.
Who knows, maybe we’ll win; maybe we’ll even figure out a way to seal Larry Summers in a kind of space barge, and fire him off into deep space, to orbit Uranus for eternity. Yves? Could it be financed?
Well, Mark, I don’t know where you were in the 60’s and early 70’s, but I was a dope smokin’, free-lovin’, hard-core member of the Union for Radical Political Economics. There were many of us my friend. When the yellow URPE pamphlet of readings came every month, I doused the doobie and dove into the writings of Bowles, Gintis, Weisskopf, MacEwan et. al. I used to particularly like to share the monthly with my other friends studying the humanities. The Poly Sci majors were always dumbfounded.
URPE eventually exploded, kind of like the student movement. Internal contradictions as we used to like to say. It exists to this day, not as the intellectual powerhouse it once was…more as a burrowing mole in the Capitalist system. When all these genius graduate assistants began moving towards full professorships the various boards of University overseers saw the clear and present danger. The black-ball was used regularly on the lot of them. They were dispersed and the intellectual impetus dissipated along with the leftist solidarity.
If someone doesn’t write a book clarifying this effort we will continue being characterized as feckless idiots…but good tippers.
Yes, Ames may be expert at finance, but either failed to experience the 60’s and 70’s first-hand, or believes what he reads in the MSM. If you were there then, you remember the daily return of body-bags from the US slaughter of Vietnamese peasants, the rapid assassination of JFK, MLK, and RFK (All we are saying is give peace a chance–Hippies on the streets). You recall the monumental peace marchers in NYC that were attacked by construction workers (Labor vs. Hippies).
Then came the 70’s and Four Dead in Ohio. California elected Reagan for the second time (1971) where he perfected his spiel about Cadillac welfare mothers and anti-labor diatribes. (He would go on to be President Reagan and fire all the US air traffic controllers for striking for better working conditions.) Those damn Hippies!!!
Mark Ames misses the mark in attempting to create a boogie-man of the Hippies. The US descent into despair is definitely a communal affair, however.
Your either part of the solution or part of the problem.
Vishnu to you.
Just returning here from visits to foxnews and cnn, which make a strong argument for giving to this site. Lovely post. Regarding pre-Yeltzin Russian journalism: all I know of it is that Matt Taibbi used to write for the Moskow Times, which if representative of the field speaks volumes. By the way, he has a new piece out here: https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/what-i-got-wrong-about-shock-therapy , about Jeff Sachs and other Harvard Boys, “grabitization”, and the Russian 90’s, which is worth a read. Apologies if it’s already been linked. The mind wanders to the thought that the present-day US may be looked back on as entering a similar era.
Good post Conner. As you say, and as most NC readers know, the route to a recovery of European prosperity is simple and affordable:
1) Make nice with Russia and get gas flowing again.
2) Begin negotiation of a joint European/Asían security agreement BEFORE pissing away trillions of dollars on military baubles. The draft 2021 Russian proposal could be a start.
Draghi must know this but is trying to engage in “the art of the posible” to satisfy his client. The problem is that if you do not identify where It is you’re trying to get to you’ll never get there.
Last time I saw Larry on tv he was in a casual interview with the very likable John Stuart-Stewart. Whoever. Larry had undergone an expert face lift. He was almost handsome. And his demeanor had been coached. He discussed topics softballed to him by John with poise instead of his usual twitches. So now he’s an executive for a big AI corporation. Dear god. Somebody please write the next Great American Novel, because you can’t make this stuff up.