Yves here. We are sure to see more articles along these lines, with more refined analyses, as the details of Trump energy sanctions emerge. This piece is still helpful as an early quick take.
Some minor issues: we recently published another OilPrice piece that argued that Trump’s “Drill, baby, drill” won’t get as far as the Administration like because the shale industry is being careful, as in return-conscious, about making investments.
Similarly, the author gets harrumph-y about China “violating” US sanctions on Iran. UN energy and financial sanctions on Iran (ex weapons sales, those expired in 2020) were lifted in 2016 as part of the JCPOA. The US exiting the JCOPA did not restore UN sanctions; the US instead imposed its own. Only UN sanctions are legal under international law. So China is within its rights to thumb its nose at these US sanctions, although it is at risk, as with US and EU sanctions against Russia, of having its banks targeted with secondary sanctions.
By Felicity Bradstock, a freelance writer specialising in Energy and Finance. Originally published at OilPrice
- Trump’s second term is likely to see a return to stricter energy sanctions on Iran, Venezuela, and Russia.
- The US is in a strong position to enforce sanctions due to record-high oil and gas production.
- Stricter sanctions could disrupt global oil markets, increase geopolitical tensions, and prompt retaliation from China.
The U.S. continues to uphold sanctions on several countries including Iran, Venezuela, and Russia. While the Biden administration eased sanctions on Venezuelan energy at the beginning of the year, and Iran has been able to increasingly circumvent sanctions, there was no clear path to bringing the sanctions to a total stop. Now, with the election of Donald Trump as President for a second non-consecutive term, U.S. energy sanctions could become stricter as he focuses on boosting domestic oil and gas output and strengthening controls on these countries.
On his campaign trail, Trump repeatedly vowed to impose stricter sanctions on Iranian and Venezuelan crude, which could lead to a decrease in the global oil supply and drive up prices. “Conceptually, the impact of a potential second Trump term on oil prices is ambiguous, with some short-term downside risk to Iran oil supply … and thus upside price risk,” Goldman Sachs commodities analysts wrote in a research note. “But medium-term downside risk to oil demand and thus oil prices from downside risk to global GDP from a potential escalation in trade tensions.”
Having often shouted the phrase “drill baby, drill” at his rallies, Trump is expected to double down on his support for U.S. oil and gas production. The uncertainty over new licenses seen during Biden’s term in office will be a thing of the past, as oil and gas companies pursue more exploration activities to maintain their record levels of crude and gas output. The U.S. is the world’s biggest oil producer, contributing 22 percent of the world’s crude, according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA).
While oil and gas output was growing to record highs under Biden, restrictions were also eased on energy from sanctioned countries, such as Iran and Venezuela. Iran is now producing around 3.5 million bpd of crude and exporting 1.8 million bpd, despite the continued sanctions. This is a significant increase from the amount being produced when Trump was in power, which fell to an official low of around 400,000 bpd under his previous administration’s “maximum pressure” campaign.
We are already starting to see a change in the trend with Iranian oil, with exports falling due to the complex geopolitical situation in the Middle East. Iran’s exports are expected to decrease even further under the new Trump administration as the stricter imposition of sanctions is to be expected. This week, Trump selected U.S. Senator Marco Rubio – who has long pushed for a tougher U.S. policy on Iran and China – as secretary of state for his new government. Bob McNally, the president of Rapidan Energy, stated, “Senator Rubio has a consistent and strong record as a hawk on Iran, Venezuela, and China.” McNally added that Rubio will “zealously implement President-elect Trump’s plans to exert pressure on Iran’s crude exports, nearly all which go to China”.
China has increased its import of discounted energy supplies from U.S.-sanctioned countries, including Iran, Venezuela and Russia, by blatantly circumventing sanctions in recent years. China has used special routes, ghost tankers, and other clandestine tactics to increase its imports of crude from these countries, and, as sanctions have loosened, it has imported oil and gas via more conventional routes.
Russia overtook Saudi Arabia to become China’s biggest crude supplier in 2023, shipping 2.14 million barrels per day of oil to the Asian giant. China also reported importing 11 percent more crude from Iran in the first three months of 2024 than during the same period in 2023. This could present an issue as Trump attempts to impose stricter sanctions, potentially prompting China to retaliate if its energy supplies are disrupted.
Nevertheless, Trump has doubled down on his plans for stricter sanctions on all three countries. In October, Venezuela’s oil exports rose to 950,000 barrels per day, a four-year high. However, Jose Cardenas, Washington strategic consultant and lobbyist, explained, “Revoking the oil licenses would send a powerful signal to not only Maduro, the opposition, the EU, and others that the U.S. is serious about a democratic transition taking place in Venezuela.” Any move to further strengthen sanctions on Venezuela would likely push the South American country closer to Iran and China, which could cause geopolitical tensions for the U.S. and its allies.
When it comes to Russia, Ian Bremmer, the president of political risk consultancy Eurasia Group, said, “What I am hearing from Trump advisors is that Trump would be prepared to put much tougher sanctions against them,” if Russia rejects a peace deal. As the U.S. has increased its natural gas output significantly over the last few years, and its allies have secured alternative gas supplies, it leaves Trump in a strong position to enforce strict sanctions on Russian energy.
Based on what Trump said during his campaign trail and the people that he is appointing to key government positions, it seems likely that he will impose stricter energy sanctions on Iran, Venezuela, and Russia when he takes office. The U.S. is in a strong position to do this as its oil and gas output stands at an all-time high. However, stricter sanctions could lead China to retaliate, as its energy supply chains become disrupted. It could also encourage Venezuela and Iran to deepen their ties with one another, thereby creating greater geopolitical unrest.
I think that US establishment is in for a rude awakening. Much of Russian oil is laundered through India, which US is trying to cultivate into a counterweight to China. Iran’s export are increasingly laundered through Saudi Arabia and Qatar, both of which are virtually untouchable in DC. So who are you going to sanction?
More importantly, US has nothing to offer to other countries to get voluntary compliance. Decline in economic power reduced the importance of US markets and fiscal restrictions make it difficult to pass any kind of economic aid through Congress. So the only option is a shitty IMF/World Bank loans which are usually trumped by Chinese lenders.
So both carrot and stick are gone, but there is very little awareness about the real state of affairs in the US. These are the same people which expect Russia to roll over and for peace because its economy is due to collapse any day now. Rude awakenings indeed.
Iran oil sanctions will be one of the best thing that happens to China (bad for anti-China hawks)….in the sense that it only encourages electrification of the Chinese transport sector.
China is already years ahead of the West in EV adoption (average driver drives less, relative temperate climate, Chinese people hate car exhaust too, etc).
If conflict ever reaches a boiling point, the West can’t threat to embargo Chinese hydrocarbon imports via the Straits of Molucca.
Trump will have an impact on renewables but “Just Have A Think”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MY7ZFb26PwA
addresses the impact of the IRA on jobs and investments in Republican states. Many of those jobs and investments are located there with Texas being the largest in solar and wind in the country. Oil can’t compete on costs and Texas politicians fear another freeze out due to failed fossil fuels.
The video is worth the 12 minute view. The maps of Republican/Democratic victories by county is fascinating and haven’t seen it before.
Si legem rumpere debetis, potestatem rapiendi facite: in reliquis observa.
Please provide translations when quoting Latin beyond famous phrases like Carthago delanda est.
It’s not clear that Trump can significantly increase oil & gas production in the short run & certainly not in the longer term. Production from the major tight oil (shale fracking) has apparently peaked or has been falling, something that experts like Arthur Berman have widely predicted. Banks & venture capitalists have severely cut back on funding oil exploration and capital expenditures due to higher interest rates & the long horizon for return on investments in the oil sector.
Another factor driving this reluctance to fund the oil industry is linked to the promotion of the idea of a renewable energy future replacing fossil fuels. The thinking goes something like this- “If the future is in renewables, why should I invest huge amounts of money today for new oil exploration and capex and wait years for my returns, when I can make a buck more quickly investing in EVs, emerging technologies & AI.” In addition, the risk of stranded oil assets if the renewable “revolution” succeeds must weigh heavily on the minds of the bankers.
Keep in mind that 2023 saw the highest level of oil production in US history only because about 40% was from fracking. I predict that 4 years from now US oil production will in gradual & then steep decline & that it will become increasingly clear that the renewable “revolution” is a chimera. Hopefully by then it will begin to sink in that the only “solution” to the energy dilemma is radical energy conservation.
There are also the environmental impacts of fracking that are becoming more and more obvious, and less able to be ignored. Increased fracking is not and never will be a geopolitical godsend for the US.
Energy conservation will come with a rummaging, feral populous.
Consumption will be almost perfectly efficient.