2:00PM Water Cooler 1/30/2025

Bird Song of the Day

Brown Thrasher, Stipson Island Rd., Cape May, New Jersey, United States/

* * *

In Case You Might Miss…

1. The Rescinded OMB “freeze” memo: after-action reports and interpretations.
2. Beware the so-called “buyout” scheme.
3. Tulsi Gabbard nomination for DNI.

* * *

Look for the Helpers

If you are in the LA area:

Free air purifiers in #LA – retweet please.https://t.co/ti2lNcypAd continues to donate HEPA +Active Carbon air cleaners to the @LADreamCenter as part of our online "Buy One, We Donate One" emergency relief program throughout January. Last Saturday a large supply of MA-35 units… https://t.co/NEGN7WvJd5 pic.twitter.com/ecEkXoijRb

— Tony Colaneri (@TonyColaneri) January 29, 2025

* * *

My email address is down by the plant; please send examples of there (“Helpers” in the subject line). In our increasingly desperate and fragile neoliberal society, everyday normal incidents and stories of “the communism of everyday life” are what I am looking for (and not, say, the Red Cross in Hawaii, or even the UNWRA in Gaza).

Politics

“So many of the social reactions that strike us as psychological are in fact a rational management of symbolic capital.” –Pierre Bourdieu, Classification Struggles

* * *

Trump Administration

“Litigation Tracker: Legal Challenges to Trump Administration Actions” [Just Security]. • Rather a lot. Worth a look (though it gives the creeps that the lawfare spooks are tracking the work they themselves inspire).

“The lawyers are getting louder – and they’re getting results” [Dan Froomkin, HeadsUp News]. The deck: “9 ways advocacy groups are trying to block Trump.” • Ah, the “groups.” Does anybody seriously believe that the NGOs will do the work that the electeds of the Democrat Party cannot rouse themselves to do? Not to mention that whatever reaches today’s Supreme Court is likely to bring about blowback.

* * *

“Did Backlash Really Kill the Trump Funding Freeze?” [Ed Kilgore, New York Magazine]. “Why did Team Trump back off this particular initiative so quickly? It’s easy to say the administration was responding to D.C. district judge Loren AliKhan’s injunction halting the freeze. But then again, the administration (and particularly OMB director nominee Russell Vought) has been spoiling for a court fight over the constitutionality of the Impoundment Control Act that the proposed freeze so obviously violated. Surely something else was wrong with the freeze, aside from the incredible degree of chaos associated with its rollout, requiring multiple clarifications of which agencies and programs it affected (which may have been a feature rather than a bug to the initiative’s government-hating designers). According to the New York Times, the original OMB memo, despite its unprecedented nature and sweeping scope, wasn’t even vetted by senior White House officials like alleged policy overlord Stephen Miller…. [T]he funding freeze looks like a clear misstep for an administration and a Republican Party that were walking very tall after the 47th president’s first week in office, giving Democrats a rare perceived ‘win.'” Note my previously expressed strictures on sloppy drafting. But: “It’s far too early, however, to imagine that the chaos machine humming along at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue will fall silent even for a moment…. . Democrats and Trump-skeptical Republicans will need to stay on their toes to keep up with this administration’s schemes and its willingness to shatter norms.” And: “But it’s true that the electorate that lifted Trump to the White House for the second time almost surely wasn’t voting to sharply cut, if not terminate, the host of popular federal programs that appeared to be under the gun when OMB issued its funding freeze memo.” • Hence footnote 2: Social Security and Medicare were “popular Federal programs” among voters of both parties, hence fenced off. Not so Medicaid.

“Trump’s First Big Fiasco Triggers Stephen Miller’s Rage—Take Note Dems” [The New Republic]. “White House adviser Stephen Miller is frantically searching for scapegoats to blame for the unfolding disaster around President Donald Trump’s massive freeze on federal spending.” That may be so, but the White House also cut its losses immediately. More: “All of which carries a lesson for Democrats: This is what it looks like when the opposition stirs and uses its power in a unified way to make a lot of what you might call sheer political noise. That can help set the media agenda, throw Trump and his allies on the defensive, and deliver defeats to Trump that deflate his cultish aura of invincibility.” And: ” nternal party debates suggest that many Democrats believe that Trump’s 2024 victory shows voters don’t care about the dire threat he poses to democracy and constitutional governance, or that defending them against Trump must be reducible to ‘kitchen table’ appeals. But the funding freeze fiasco should illustrate that this reading is highly insufficient. An understanding of the moment shaped around the idea that voters are mostly reachable only via economic concerns—however important—fails to provide guidance on how to convey to voters why things like this extraordinary Trumpian power grab actually matter.” • How in the name of sweet suffering Jeebus is cutting Medicaid not an economic concern?! (Also, I’m so, so tired of Democrats psychologizing things, whether in foreign or domestic policy. Miller’s rage, Putin’s fear…. It’s high school stuff. Provoking an enemy’s emotional reaction is the subtext of so many stories. It’s hardly strategic.)

“The Trump White House Wants A Court Challenge Over Frozen Funds” [HuffPo]. “The Trump administration’s federal government funding freeze instituted Monday and apparently rescinded Wednesday appears to be a part of the White House’s official policy to get courts to hand President Donald Trump the power to pick and choose which congressionally authorized funding he will spend, according to a confidential document obtained by HuffPost. The confidential Office of Management and Budget document outlining “regulatory misalignment” calls on Trump to issue executive orders blocking the release of appropriated funds in order to provoke a court challenge over the president’s power to impound such funds…. [The] confusing series of events and conflicting statements and actions [over the OMB memo] may be a fiasco, but the confidential OMB document makes clear that the administration intends on fomenting this very court challenge over the president’s power to not spend congressionally authorized funds.” • So the lawfare strategy could end up playing the Republicans game, culminating in blowback. How unfortunate there’s no other avenue for redress. And here is an even more Machiavellian theory:

I rather strongly suspect the funding freeze – revoked today – was simply an experiment to see where all the money was actually going by tracking subsequent screaming and panicked donation requests on social media.

Targeted action can be expected to follow later. https://t.co/SESzGTYhlt

— Armchair Warlord (@ArmchairW) January 29, 2025

* * *

“Beware the “Deferred Resignation” Offer: A Legally Dubious Proposal for Federal Employees” [Just Security]. Skipping over the detail on statutes: “[A}gencies would still need a valid legal justification for prolonged administrative leave, and it is not clear that OPM’s offer would be sufficient….[I]t is not advisable that workers rely on the administration’s promise to honor the wishes of employees who elect to resign and then decide instead to stay…. Employees considering the deferred resignation offer should be aware that resignation acceptance is not guaranteed… Federal employees should not rush into accepting this offer without consulting their union representatives or legal counsel. ” And now the Machiavellian part: “[T]his plan has the potential to upend entire agencies and divisions if large numbers of employees take the deal. Without sufficient budget space to hire replacements, critical government functions could be severely reduced or even eliminated, leaving essential services that Americans rely on with no staff to carry them out. This lack of a transition strategy makes the proposal not only legally dubious but also highly irresponsible from a public policy standpoint…. There is possibly a deeper agenda at play as well. By timing the latest resignation date to the end of the fiscal year, the administration isn’t just accelerating workforce reductions—it’s preemptively cutting these positions from the next federal budget, effectively shrinking agencies permanently.” • Ingenious!

“I Just Got Trump’s “Buyout” Offer at My Job. Let Me Tell You How That’s Going” [Salon]. On the “fork in the road” mail: “This email, much of which was copied and pasted from a similar message sent to Twitter employees after Elon Musk—Trump’s pick to lead his effort to overhaul the civil service, otherwise known as the Department of Government Efficiency—took over that company, proclaims that the federal workforce will be undergoing significant changes. Anyone who didn’t want to participate in this new vision was invited to reply “Resign” to the flagged-as-external email address and collect six months’ salary, without having to perform any additional work, while they looked for a new job. The details of this offer are confusing, conflict with later OPM ‘FAQs’ about the program, and seem to run afoul of long-standing legal caps on severance packages…. This latest buyout directive is evocative of A.I. gobbledygook, beyond evidently being a copy-and-paste job from Musk’s Twitter exploits. When technologists assess a new A.I. language tool, the go-to metric is generally not the accuracy of its product, or even the consistency of its answers. It is engagement. Substance is pushed aside in pursuit of simply keeping human eyeballs trained on its messages for as long as possible. Once considered a proxy for content’s ability to be “valuable” or “worthwhile,” attention itself has become the commodity we’re after: looks, likes, clicks, play next episode. Unfortunately, one of the easiest ways to engage people is to enrage them.” • Interesting to imagine that the whole scheme is designed to extract data on how best to manipulate the Federal workforce via email…

Nominations

Tulsi Gabbard will bring sunlight to a rotten system” [The Spectator]. “Americans have understandably lost trust in our intelligence services. In choosing Lieutenant Colonel Gabbard, President Trump has picked a highly-qualified, reform-minded leader who can regain that trust. The fact that her nomination has engendered such blowback in the media, driven and organized by the failed leadership class of past administrations, is a sign of how much they fear her. They dread what she represents: sunlight and transparency, a bright light confronting a dark, rotten system ridden rife with liars and frauds. The intelligence services of the United States of America ought to be focused on serving our national interest. They ought to be focused on understanding the movements and intentions of the nation’s foes, anticipating dangers before they emerge and giving the commander-in-chief the information needed to stop those who would harm us. That is the reason they exist. Instead, in recent years, our intelligence services — the same people who swore to uphold the Constitution and defend us against dangerous threats — have time and again turned on the American people.” • John Brennan hates her, which is reason enough to confirm her.

“The Record Shows Tulsi Gabbard Was Not an Apologist for Russia-Backed Syria” [Aaron Maté, RealClearInvestigations]. • Magisterial from Maté, showing that the Syrian narratives that Gabbard violated were never official intelligence community assessments, but always concocted by administration flaks, through several administrations.

Snowden (1):

Tulsi Gabbard will be required to disown all prior support for whistleblowers as a condition of confirmation today. I encourage her to do so. Tell them I harmed national security and the sweet, soft feelings of staff. In D.C., that's what passes for the pledge of allegiance. pic.twitter.com/Z1OmOHgvdU

— Edward Snowden (@Snowden) January 30, 2025

Snowden (2);

Tulsi Gabbard will be required to disown all prior support for whistleblowers as a condition of confirmation today. I encourage her to do so. Tell them I harmed national security and the sweet, soft feelings of staff. In D.C., that's what passes for the pledge of allegiance. pic.twitter.com/Z1OmOHgvdU

— Edward Snowden (@Snowden) January 30, 2025

Snowden (3):

Exactly: Snowden could have sold that archive. He could have secretly passed it to America's enemies. He could have dumped it all on the internet.

He did none of that: he brought it to American journalists and asked that only the parts in the public interest be reported. https://t.co/iCfxdBpMT2

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) January 30, 2025

If the Republicans can stomach Hegseth, they can man up and confirm Gabbard.

2024 Post Mortem

“The Shrinking Electoral Relevance of PA’s Suburbs” [RealClearPolitics]. “Recent data released by the Pennsylvania Department of State indicate that Pennsylvania’s suburban voters didn’t decide the 2024 presidential election, as has been their customary role in the past. In fact, the data reveal that suburban voters were the election’s lagging indicator of a historic political realignment that has reshaped American politics for the foreseeable future. President Trump won Pennsylvania by more than 120,000 votes for two reasons. Compared to four years ago, a surge of nearly 115,000 voters came exclusively from outside of the suburbs. These voters were decidedly Trump voters. Meantime, remarkably, Philadelphia yielded Trump the largest raw vote shift of the election, with the president gaining nearly 50,000 votes in the city. In other words, rural and exurban anti-establishment voters, along with Philadelphia’s working class, handed the presidency to Trump and delivered a sweep for all statewide Republicans on the ballot….. As trust in institutions continues to erode, suburban voters stand at a crossroads, grappling with the shifting political, cultural, and economic landscape.Their preference for institutional stability is being challenged by a new majority demanding transparency, accountability, and reform. If suburban voters can reconcile these forces, they may reclaim their role as decisive actors in future elections and shape policy. Or, they may be left behind just as the working class was for generations at their expense.”

Resistance

Lambert here: I changed the name of this category from #TheResistance (Neera Tanden’s et al.’s 2016 effort) to resistance generally.

“USDA inspector general escorted out of her office after defying White House” [Reuters] • More like this, please. Why comply?

“Declassified CIA Guide to Sabotaging Fascism Is Suddenly Viral” [404 Media]. “A declassified World War II-era government guide to ‘simple sabotage’ is currently one of the most popular open source books on the internet. The book, called ‘Simple Sabotage Field Manual,’ was declassified in 2008 by the CIA and ‘describes ways to train normal people to be purposefully annoying telephone operators, dysfunctional train conductors, befuddling middle managers, blundering factory workers, unruly movie theater patrons, and so on. In other words, teaching people to do their jobs badly.’ Over the last week, the guide has surged to become the 5th-most-accessed book on Project Gutenberg, an open source repository of free and public domain ebooks.” • For example, the author begins:

And:

Democrats en déshabillé

“Democrats hammered by ugly unpopularity numbers” [Axios]. “Democrats face an uphill climb. A CNN poll conducted by SSRS earlier this month found that 70% of U.S. adults would describe themselves as disappointed with today’s politics. The same CNN poll found that 58% of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents say that the party needs major changes or to be completely reformed. Reality check: The Republican Party had worse numbers during much of the first year of Trump’s first term than what Democrats are seeing now. The percentage of voters with an unfavorable view of the Republican Party hovered around 60% in 2017, with a peak of 67% in August, according to Quinnipiac.” • Handy chart:

“Ooze,” le mot juste:

This is the Dems' plan—ooze back into power as the GOP fails, again. There's no big political reform project. Just waiting for the other side to fail. And it'll probably work. It's why no one who failed even bothers with the pretense of accountability.https://t.co/bNZJMe81JV

— Mark Ames (@MarkAmesExiled) January 29, 2025

* * *

So little party discipline, it’s not possible to call these swine “traitors”:

58 Democrats helped Republicans pass the Laken Riley Act, which will enable Trump's ICE to put migrants *accused* of shoplifting in detention, without due process.
As in, with Trump's new call to detain 30,000 migrants in Guantanamo, these Democrats may help put them there: https://t.co/YgOqkhrE8o pic.twitter.com/SyMrMvfcd1

— Prem Thakker (@prem_thakker) January 29, 2025

How much you wanna bet that at some point Trump proposes that hardy perennial, the Grand Bargain, and these Democrats join him in finally gutting Social Security and Medicare? Just wait:

"A Republican representative who is a member of the DOGE Caucus told me personally that there will be cuts to Social Security and Medicare.

These cuts are being proposed to offset the cost of tax handouts for billionaires." – Alex Lawson pic.twitter.com/DFFxjNFjLN

— Social Security Works (@SSWorks) January 29, 2025

I’d call these swine DINOs, but in fact they’re the heart of the party, the mainstream:

25 votes so far this year in the Senate

Most reliable votes against Trump

Hirono: 92%
Sanders: 92%
Warren: 92%
Markey: 88%
Schatz: 88%

Least likely to vote against Trump:
Fetterman: 16%
Gallego: 36%
Hassan: 36%
Kelly: 36%
Shaheen: 36%https://t.co/J1vkPgVkmL

— Jonathan 'Boo and Vote' Cohn (@JonathanCohn) January 30, 2025

So how come these 58 Democrats get a free pass and these two don’t (and never did):

Trump nominated 2 life-long Democrats to key Cabinet positions — Tulsi as DNI and RFK Jr. as HHS Secretary — and those are the two Senate Dems are most determined to destroy:

Tulsi because she questions the US Security State and RFK because he questions Big Pharma and Fauci: https://t.co/MdMMZqlRL2

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) January 29, 2025

* * *

Hoo boy:

Republican Funhouse

“Watch: 14 Hours of Never-Before-Published Videos From Project 2025’s Presidential Administration Academy” [ProPublica]. “ProPublica and Documented obtained more than 14 hours of never-before-published videos from Project 2025’s Presidential Administration Academy, which are intended to train the next conservative administration’s political appointees ‘to be ready on day one.’ … But Project 2025’s plan to train an army of political appointees who could battle against the so-called deep state government bureaucracy remains on track. Video trainings like these are one of the ‘four pillars’ of that plan, says Spencer Chretien, the associate director of Project 2025, in ‘Political Appointees & The Federal Workforce.’ For transparency, we are publishing the videos as we obtained them.” • Makes you wonder if the writer who butchered the OMB memo was a graduate of the putative academy. Even though there are no transcripts [snarl] no doubt some clever Democratic strategist is scanning these videos now, because they expose what Trump’s minions know about government — and what they don’t. Somehow, I don’t think 14 hours of training videos are gonna cut it.

Syndemics

“I am in earnest — I will not equivocate — I will not excuse — I will not retreat a single inch — AND I WILL BE HEARD.” –William Lloyd Garrison

* * *

Covid Resources, United States (National): Transmission (CDC); Wastewater (CDC, Biobot; includes many counties; Wastewater Scan, includes drilldown by zip); Variants (CDC; Walgreens); “Iowa COVID-19 Tracker” (in IA, but national data). “Infection Control, Emergency Management, Safety, and General Thoughts” (especially on hospitalization by city).

Lambert here: Readers, thanks for the collective effort. To update any entry, do feel free to contact me at the address given with the plants. Please put “COVID” in the subject line. Thank you!

Resources, United States (Local): AK (dashboard); AL (dashboard); AR (dashboard); AZ (dashboard); CA (dashboard; Marin, dashboard; Stanford, wastewater; Oakland, wastewater); CO (dashboard; wastewater); CT (dashboard); DE (dashboard); FL (wastewater); GA (wastewater); HI (dashboard); IA (wastewater reports); ID (dashboard, Boise; dashboard, wastewater, Central Idaho; wastewater, Coeur d’Alene; dashboard, Spokane County); IL (wastewater); IN (dashboard); KS (dashboard; wastewater, Lawrence); KY (dashboard, Louisville); LA (dashboard); MA (wastewater); MD (dashboard); ME (dashboard); MI (wastewater; wastewater); MN (dashboard); MO (wastewater); MS (dashboard); MT (dashboard); NC (dashboard); ND (dashboard; wastewater); NE (dashboard); NH (wastewater); NJ (dashboard); NM (dashboard); NV (dashboard; wastewater, Southern NV); NY (dashboard); OH (dashboard); OK (dashboard); OR (dashboard); PA (dashboard); RI (dashboard); SC (dashboard); SD (dashboard); TN (dashboard); TX (dashboard); UT (wastewater); VA (wastewater); VT (dashboard); WA (dashboard; dashboard); WI (wastewater); WV (wastewater); WY (wastewater).

Resources, Canada (National): Wastewater (Government of Canada).

Resources, Canada (Provincial): ON (wastewater); QC (les eaux usées); BC (wastewater); BC, Vancouver (wastewater).

Hat tips to helpful readers: Alexis, anon (2), Art_DogCT, B24S, CanCyn, ChiGal, Chuck L, Festoonic, FM, FreeMarketApologist (4), Gumbo, hop2it, JB, JEHR, JF, JL Joe, John, JM (10), JustAnotherVolunteer, JW, KatieBird, KF, KidDoc, LL, Michael King, KF, LaRuse, mrsyk, MT, MT_Wild, otisyves, Petal (6), RK (2), RL, RM, Rod, square coats (11), tennesseewaltzer, thump, Tom B., Utah, Bob White (3).

Stay safe out there!

* * *

Lambert here: Everything’s gone dark except for trusty New York State hospitalization (daily), Walgreen’s positivity (weekly), and the Cleveland Clinic? Readers, do you have any suggestions about alternatives at state level? Thank you! How I wish we had Biobot back….

TABLE 1: Daily Covid Charts

Wastewater
This week[1] CDC January 13	Last week[2] CDC (until next week):
Variants [3] CDC January 18	Emergency Room Visits[4] CDC January 11
Hospitalization
★ New York[5] New York State, data January 29:	National [6] CDC January 24:
Positivity
National[7] Walgreens January 27:	Ohio[8] Cleveland Clinic January 18:
Travelers Data
Positivity[9] CDC December 30:	Variants[10] CDC December 30
Deaths
Weekly Deaths vs. % Positivity [11] CDC January 11:	Weekly Deaths vs. ED Visits [12] CDC January 11:

LEGEND

1) ★ for charts new today; all others are not updated.

2) For a full-size/full-resolution image, Command-click (MacOS) or right-click (Windows) on the chart thumbnail and “open image in new tab.”

NOTES

[1] (CDC) Seeing more red and more orange, but nothing new at major hubs.

[2] (CDC) Last week’s wastewater map.

[3] (CDC Variants) XEC takes over. That WHO label, “Ommicron,” has done a great job normalizing successive waves of infection.

[4] (ED) A little uptick.

[5] (Hospitalization: NY) Definitely jumped.

[6] (Hospitalization: CDC). Leveling out.

[7] (Walgreens) Leveling out.

[8] (Cleveland) Continued upward trend since, well, Thanksgiving.

[9] (Travelers: Positivity) Leveling out.

[10] (Travelers: Variants). Positivity is new, but variants have not yet been released.

[11] Deaths low, positivity leveling out.

[12] Deaths low, ED leveling out.

Stats Watch

Employment Situation: “United States Initial Jobless Claims” [Trading Economics]. “Initial jobless claims in the US sank by 16,000 from the previous week to 207,000 in the period ending January 25th, firmly below market expectations of 220,000 to mark a sharp pullback from the near two-month high last week and match the lower range of readings from recent weeks…. The result was consistent with the Federal Reserve’s statement that the US labor market has steadied near solid levels, adding leeway for rates to remain at the restrictive level for a longer period.”

* * *

Manufacturing: Boeing: a way out of the crisis or just window-dressing?” [MarketScreener]. “Boeing is also under fire from the engineers’ union, which is investigating possible job relocations to non-union regions. Despite these tensions, analyst Richard Aboulafia (AeroDynamic Advisory) remains pragmatic: ‘The path to increased production is mapped out, and the market wants its planes.'”

Manufacturing: “Elon Musk Wants Boeing To Rush Trump’s New Air Force One” [Jalopnik]. “Considering just how sketchy things have been at Boeing for a while now, I personally wouldn’t be to hasty to have the company rush a product.” • Indeed.

Tech: Attentive readers may have noticed that I file AI under “Tech” rather than “The Bezzle,” despite the bubble-icious nature of Silicon Valley’s quest for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). This extract from Philip K. Dick’s unsettling Ubik explains why:

I don’t believe AI will fail (as bezzles ultimately do). I believe AI will succeed in infiltrating every single relationship we have today, as well as every affordance (i.e., a doorknob that opens a door, or a dial that raises and lowers the temperature). The result of AI’s infiltration will be an orgy of rental extraction (“five cents, please”) followed by enshittification, according to the well-known product life-cycle first identified by Cory Doctorow.

Tech:

President Xi please save us from Adobe's ridiculous monthly subscription charges and shitty policies! https://t.co/XAaIuRu7qd

— Brad Sigal (@BradSigal) January 29, 2025

I use LightRoom and InDesign a lot. But I used to be able to own them, not subscribe to them!

* * *

Today’s Fear & Greed Index: 47 Neutral (previous close: 45 Neutral) [CNN]. One week ago: 45 (Neutral). (0 is Extreme Fear; 100 is Extreme Greed). Last updated Jan 30 at 12:42:01 PM ET.

Photo Book

Yikes:

ZOOM IN: Finally, a low level panorama photo of the Pacific Palisades, from the west, almost from end-to-end pic.twitter.com/qfP2NPaKwo

— Chris Cristi (@abc7chriscristi) January 28, 2025

Gallery

“Piled High: 17th-Century Dutch Banquet Scenes” [The Public Domain Review]. “The feast laid out is lavish, but the table is so overladen, there is no space to dine. This is the somewhat absurd scenario staged by the tablescapes of Dutch banquet still life paintings. Also known as pronkstilleven, or “sumptuous still lifes”, these scenes are a distinct subgenre of still life painting that gained fleeting popularity in the mid-seventeenth century. Mountainous jumbles of sensuous luxury commodities — luscious fruits; savory meats and seafood; ostentatious servingware of gold, silver, and porcelain; and exotic imported textiles — simultaneously mound upward and tumble toward the spectator. The tabletops in these scenes do not support static display but rather facilitate an aggressive spilling forth. As if to drive the point home, the efflux of pie filling in Adriaen van Utrecht’s canvas serves as a visual metonym for the overall scene in which an array of fragrant, piquant treats is about to breach the boundary of the picture plane.” • For example:

I love that Dutch has “pronk” and English has “sumptuous.”

Zeitgeist Watch

Not sure where this clip comes from, or why the racial subtext:

It fucking tried to rise up at 0:46 lmfao. May not be a good precedent for his retarded fans, but these things are gonna mog humans in a few years, so whatever.

— JB (@JasonBotterill3) January 29, 2025

I agree that kicking the robot is stupid. What they should do is set it on fire.

Class Warfare

“The Capitalist Tyranny of Extraversion” [Benjamin Cain]. ” capitalistic culture is liable to be hostile to introversion because reflection is bad for business. When you stop to think, you’re less likely to buy because the salesperson’s pitch is typically fallacious, and no one needs most of what’s sold. To sell those frivolous goods, the desire for them must itself be manufactured, and that’s done by a materialistic, hedonic religion that prescribes cattle-like, infantile mentalities. If your possessions make you happy, especially in a world in which most people earn pennies a day, you’re likely a mentally shallow person, which is to say you’re an extravert. It just so happens that extraverted, consumer cultures also threaten the planet’s ecosystems with pollution and mass extinctions of wildlife. Extraverts would shoot first and ask questions later; they “seize the day,” as their shallow, Americanized Stoicism encourages them to do, so they don’t trouble themselves with much long-term reflection. They trust capitalism will save us by encouraging innovators to address the problems of global warming, overpopulation, demagogic exploitation of personal liberties, and so on.” • I’m uncomfortable with the over-use of the “cattle” metaphor. Nevertheless….

News of the Wired

“I was going to tell a time traveling joke but you didn’t laugh” Apocryphal deadpan one-liner. Steven Wright as the ultimate Dad-joker?

* * *

Contact information for plants: Readers, feel free to contact me at lambert [UNDERSCORE] strether [DOT] corrente [AT] yahoo [DOT] com, to (a) find out how to send me a check if you are allergic to PayPal and (b) to find out how to send me images of plants. Vegetables are fine! Fungi, lichen, and coral are deemed to be honorary plants! If you want your handle to appear as a credit, please place it at the start of your mail in parentheses: (thus). Otherwise, I will anonymize by using your initials. See the previous Water Cooler (with plant) here. From Wukchumni:

Wukchumni writes: “Saline hot springs.”

* * *

Readers: Water Cooler is a standalone entity not covered by the annual NC fundraiser. Material here is Lambert’s, and does not express the views of the Naked Capitalism site. If you see a link you especially like, or an item you wouldn’t see anywhere else, please do not hesitate to express your appreciation in tangible form. Remember, a tip jar is for tipping! Regular positive feedback both makes me feel good and lets me know I’m on the right track with coverage. When I get no donations for three or four days I get worried. More tangibly, a constant trickle of donations helps me with expenses, and I factor in that trickle when setting fundraising goals:

Here is the screen that will appear, which I have helpfully annotated:

If you hate PayPal, you can email me at lambert [UNDERSCORE] strether [DOT] corrente [AT] yahoo [DOT] com, and I will give you directions on how to send a check. Thank you!