Wolf Richter: DOGE Seeks to Shed Vast Amounts of Government Office Space. Here’s How Much the Government Leases, and Where, and What Leases it Can Shed During Trump’s Term

By Wolf Richter, editor of Wolf Street. Originally published at Wolf Street.

The DOGE people in the Trump administration are considering shedding a big portion of the massive office space that the government owns or leases nationwide, managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), including selling two-thirds of the office space the government owns and terminating three-quarters of the leased office space, according to the WSJ.

Much of this office space is vacant or underused and poorly maintained due to lack of funding, according to GSA testimony before Congress in 2023, cited by the WSJ, which further noted:

“A recent report from Sen. Joni Ernst, a Republican from Iowa who chairs the Senate DOGE caucus, found that not one of the headquarters for any major agency or department in Washington is more than half full. GSA-owned buildings in Washington, D.C., average about a 12% occupancy rate. The government owns more than 7,500 vacant buildings across the country, and more than 2,200 that are partially empty.”

The office sector is already in a depression, with default rates that exceed those during the worst moments of the Financial Crisis. Putting this inventory on the market for sale is going to weigh on the already collapsed prices of older office buildings – prices of 50-70% below the last sale before the pandemic are now common.

And terminating leases is going to stress office buildings, their landlords, and their lenders even more, likely entailing more defaults and foreclosure sales. This is a much needed but very bitter medicine to alleviate government waste.

What Office Landlords and Their Lenders Are Facing

Here we look at the leased office space, where those buildings are, and what portion of the leased space the GSA has the right to terminate in 2025, and also through 2028 (Trump 2.0), based on an analysis from Trepp, which tracks commercial real estate debt and CMBS.

  • GSA leases 149 million square feet (msf) of office space around the US.
  • GSA pays $5.2 billion in annual rent to private-sector landlords.
  • Through 2028, GSA has the right to terminate 53.1 msf of leases, or 35.5% of its leased space, spread over 2,532 properties.
  • In 2025, GSA has termination rights on 21.2 msf spread over more than 1,000 properties,
  • If GSA terminates all possible leases during Trump 2.0, it would save the government $1.87 billion in annual rent after 2028.
  • In the vast Washington DC metro, GSA leases nearly 10% of the entire office market, 35.8 msf in 446 buildings, and can terminate 9.6 msf of that in 2025.
  • In the Washington D.C. metro, GSA currently pays $1.47 billion in annual rent.
  • GSA leases nearly 6% of the office space in the Kansas City metro (DoD, USPS, Treasury, VA, and USDA), 4.3 msf, of which it can terminate 1.0 msf in 2025.

Here are the top 10 metros in terms of government office space. GSA leases 66.3 msf of office space in them and has termination rights in 2025 on 18.9 msf (28.5%):

Metropolitan area Number of buildings Office space
msf
% of total market Annual Rent, Million $ Space with termination rights in 2025, msf
Washington DC 446 35.8 9.7% $1,470 9.59
New York City 223 5.0 0.7% $249 1.53
Hagerstown-Martinsburg 60 4.8 N/A $210 1.58
Kansas City 78 4.3 5.8% $99 1.03
Philadelphia 124 3.0 2.9% $97 0.71
Atlanta 90 3.0 1.9% $68 1.35
Los Angeles 168 3.0 1.0% $134 1.04
Dallas-Fort Worth 86 2.8 1.4% $82 0.57
Chicago 113 2.4 1.0% $92 0.93
Denver 74 2.3 2.3% $77 0.58
Total 1,462  66.3 $2,576 18.9

Office CRE Would Be Stressed Enough Without This

The office sector of commercial real estate is in a depression, and office debt just keeps getting worse: The delinquency rate of office mortgages across the US that have been securitized into commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) spiked to a record 11% at the end of 2024, blowing by the Financial Crisis peak, having exploded over the past 24 months from an everything-is-just-fine 1.6% at the end of 2022, to a disastrous 11.0% at the end of 2024.

The motto in 2024 was “survive till 2025” via extend-and-pretend. But now it’s 2025, and here comes the government’s vacant office space.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This entry was posted in Free markets and their discontents, Investment outlook, Politics, Privatization, Real estate on by .

About Lambert Strether

Readers, I have had a correspondent characterize my views as realistic cynical. Let me briefly explain them. I believe in universal programs that provide concrete material benefits, especially to the working class. Medicare for All is the prime example, but tuition-free college and a Post Office Bank also fall under this heading. So do a Jobs Guarantee and a Debt Jubilee. Clearly, neither liberal Democrats nor conservative Republicans can deliver on such programs, because the two are different flavors of neoliberalism (“Because markets”). I don’t much care about the “ism” that delivers the benefits, although whichever one does have to put common humanity first, as opposed to markets. Could be a second FDR saving capitalism, democratic socialism leashing and collaring it, or communism razing it. I don’t much care, as long as the benefits are delivered. To me, the key issue — and this is why Medicare for All is always first with me — is the tens of thousands of excess “deaths from despair,” as described by the Case-Deaton study, and other recent studies. That enormous body count makes Medicare for All, at the very least, a moral and strategic imperative. And that level of suffering and organic damage makes the concerns of identity politics — even the worthy fight to help the refugees Bush, Obama, and Clinton’s wars created — bright shiny objects by comparison. Hence my frustration with the news flow — currently in my view the swirling intersection of two, separate Shock Doctrine campaigns, one by the Administration, and the other by out-of-power liberals and their allies in the State and in the press — a news flow that constantly forces me to focus on matters that I regard as of secondary importance to the excess deaths. What kind of political economy is it that halts or even reverses the increases in life expectancy that civilized societies have achieved? I am also very hopeful that the continuing destruction of both party establishments will open the space for voices supporting programs similar to those I have listed; let’s call such voices “the left.” Volatility creates opportunity, especially if the Democrat establishment, which puts markets first and opposes all such programs, isn’t allowed to get back into the saddle. Eyes on the prize! I love the tactical level, and secretly love even the horse race, since I’ve been blogging about it daily for fourteen years, but everything I write has this perspective at the back of it.

21 comments

  1. griffen

    In the early to middle 1990’s, the US government went about closing military bases and or decommissioned military installations across the country. This looks to be a highly comparable moment in time, but for this current era the deficit is much worse while the national debt has only ever gone higher ( no matter what the out of power party says on the matter )…

    Closing up under utilized office buildings, whether that space is owned or leased seems like pretty low hanging fruit. I’m sure the lenders can appropriately adjust with the times.

    Adding in that absent any best approach ( banks, or lenders and fixed income investment portfolios ) there can be put into play the bust out move ala from Goodfellas…\Sarc

    Reply
  2. The Rev Kev

    The other day Trump ordered every Federal worker to go back to the office in person, pandemic be damned. Did he do this to offset even by a little the effect of all those rentals coming onto the market by having those workers back in their offices?

    Reply
    1. mrsyk

      The “back to the office” order seems to be at odds with the ” selling two-thirds of the office space the government owns and terminating three-quarters of the leased office space”. Maybe Musk wants to market the office space as “fully staffed”?
      The titans of PE woke up with twisted knickers this morning, heh heh.

      Reply
      1. MT_Wild

        Back to the office is to get feds to bend the knee and/or quit.

        Perhaps after the purge they’ll allow telework for those feds that remain or consolidate them into fewer buildings.

        Reply
        1. marym

          Fewer than a fifth of the workers in [the Office of Personnel Management]’s database – about 449,500 – “ work in DC, MD, and VA. A comparable number work for the VA – presumably all across the country (though I think property management is within the VA, not part of the GSA numbers referenced in this post). In any case there will be some challenges consolidating the “feds” in fewer buildings.

          https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/01/07/what-the-data-says-about-federal-workers/

          Reply
    2. Timbuktoo

      The mandates of neoliberalism and crony capitalism are in play. Terminate the leases to crash property values. Cronies buy the properties at fire sale prices (if they haven’t already done so). Federal workers are forced back to the offices creating artificial demand by presidential proclamation. Lucrative new long-term lease agreements are signed with the cronies. Ah, the wondrous workings of the free market, in response to the unpredictable changes in economic conditions.

      Reply
  3. timbers

    DOGE might consider requiring all vacant buildings remove their entrance doors, in a nod to the homeless crisis. With NYC at the 2nd top of the vacancy list, that might put us closer to a real “Escape from New York” in real time.

    Reply
  4. Not Again

    Look at those annual rent savings!
    $56 million
    $39 million

    We’re gonna close that $35 trillion deficit in only a couple centuries.

    PT Barnum is just distracting you again.

    Here’s the Trump Revolution in three steps:
    1) Gulf of America
    2) a tax cut for Jeff Bezos
    3) That’s it.

    Reply
  5. scott s.

    Closing office space has an advantage in that if the employees’ new location is in the commuting area they have to either suck it up and accept that or resign. If outside, the gov’t may need to PCS them, but again a percentage won’t be willing to move.

    Reply
  6. steppenwolf fetchit

    How do the lines of power and command work and flow? Does DOGE have any real power here? Is President Musk indeed the true real President?

    If he decrees that X-amount of office base be shed, can he give the order and ‘make it so’? Perhaps President Musk’s brain-control engineers are even now working on a meme featuring Captain Picard with the face of President Musk saying ” Make it So.”

    Reply
  7. Joe Well

    Can you imagine the dent we could make in the housing crisis if we had an actual government that cared?

    I know office buildings usually don’t convert to apartment buildings very well, but the feds have infinite resources. Just knock it down and hand it off to housing developers as greenfields.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *