The UK’s Online Safety Act and other things they don’t like to talk about.
Evghenia Gutul, the Leader of Gagauzi, Has Been Arrested in Moldova
According to Usnews; Police in Moldova detained Eugenia Gutul at Chisinau’s international airport late on Tuesday, following the unexplained disappearance of two other wanted pro-Russian lawmakers. Gutul, the leader, or Bashkan, of Gagauzia, was being held for 72 hours in the capital, said Angela Starinschi, an official with Moldova’s Anti-Corruption Centre.
The article goes on to explain:
Gagauzia, a 140,000-strong [autonomous] region in the south of Moldova, is dominated by ethnic Turks who favour close ties with Russia, adhere to Orthodox Christianity and have had uneasy relations with central authorities since Moldovan independence in 1991. Gutul, a fierce critic of the [Maia Sandu] government, was elected Bashkan in 2023.
The UK Is Set to Increase Sanctions on Russia
Among the sanctions there is one on North Korean Defense Minister No Kwang Chol and other North Korean generals and senior officials allegedly complicit in deploying over 11,000 DPRK forces to Russia. Putin is using DPRK forces as cannon fodder (note: this is on the official UK government website); DPRK has suffered over 4,000 casualties. There is no independent confirmation that there are any DPRK troops on the battlefield in the SMO and the South Koreans (who originated the story) showed no evidence of North Korean troops in Kursk, according to European officials who were present for the 90-minute meeting to discuss the matter at NATO headquarters and later spoke to The Associated Press about the briefing on condition of anonymity. However, there is evidence of UK troops operating and being killed on the SMO battlefield. And let us not forget:
That information came from RT, so, can we believe them? Meanwhile, on the other side of the pond:
Denmark Is Speeding Up Plans for Mandatory Military Service For Women
In response to President Trump’s threat to annex Greenland, Denmark will start drafting women into the military in 2026, accelerating previous plans to increase the size of its armed force. The comprehensive bill, which “includes full equality and the introduction of conscript lieutenants and sergeants,” will come into effect on July 1, 2025, meaning that women who are 18 or older after this date will be required to serve if there are not enough volunteers.
Copenhagen’s current policy maintains that women can join the armed forces on a voluntary basis but will not be conscripted. Men are called to serve through a lottery system meant to compensate for a possible lack of volunteers.
The Danish government recently introduced a €6.6 billion increase in defense spending. The 50bn Danish kroner “acceleration fund” will be used to make rapid investments in fighting capability aimed at strengthening short-term defense capabilities and meeting NATO requirements.
You can read more here.
The ICC Has Embroiled Itself in an Inter-Family Squabble in the Philippines
The former president of the Philippines, Rodrigo Duterte, is currently being held by the ICC despite the fact that the Philippines no longer recognizes the court. The ICC claimed jurisdiction on the basis of the alleged ‘crimes’ had taken place while the court was recognized there. Duterte’s daughter, who happens to be the Vice President, has condemned his arrest, describing it as a kidnapping. His son, Davao City Mayor Sebastian Duterte, has intimated that this was an inter-family squabble, saying that Duterte senior had shrugged off criticism with regards to a state funeral for the current president’s father yet was now being treated badly in return.
In response to the arrest, the Manila Times, a leading newspaper in the Philippines, said: “the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) case against former president Rodrigo Duterte is an “abomination, a huge, horrific hoax.” They even named the alleged originator of the hoax, a human rights lawyer called Jose Diokno. The US is suspected of having a hand in the arrest, as Duterte was seen as being too close to China; whereas, Bongbong Marcos, the current president, has now allowed the US to install missile systems capable of hitting Chinese interests on its soil.
Duterte, who is 80 years old, has a number of health issues, including Buerger’s disease and Barrett’s esophagus, and the fear is that he’ll be subjected to the same fate as Slobodan Milošević. In February 2007, the International Court of Justice cleared Serbia under Milošević’s rule of direct responsibility for occurrences of crime committed during the Bosnian War. The acquittal took place the year after his death, caused, according to his supporters, by the deliberate withholding of medical treatment for a serious heart condition.
European Gas Supplies Are Depleting at a Faster Rate Than Expected
Cold weather in Europe has caused the region’s natural gas reserves to decline at their fastest rate since 2018. According to data from Gas Infrastructure Europe, storage facilities are currently 70 percent – from about 86 percent at the same time a year ago. Moreover, gas reserves are currently down 25 percent from last year’s peak, the biggest decline in seven years.
Europe is increasingly relying on liquefied natural gas (LNG) from other countries of the world as an alternative to gas imported through pipelines from Russia. This has increased the risk of instability in the market. In addition, the closure of Norway’s Hammerfest LNG plant due to mechanical problems may further intensify market instability.
It is becoming increasingly obvious that the ill-conceived EU sanctions on Russian pipeline gas are primarily responsible for the huge increase in costs and the reduction in supply, as these two charts clearly show:
In an attempt to bring gas prices down in Slovakia, which was seriously affected by the Ukrainian decision, allegedly on the urging of the EU commission, to halt European gas transit, the State Oil Company of Azerbaijan (SOCAR) started supplying gas to the largest state-owned energy operator of Slovakia – SPP. Gas supplies are carried out based on a short-term pilot contract between SOCAR and SPP. The companies aim to develop a longer-term energy partnership. Slovakia has become the twelfth country to receive Azerbaijani gas, along with Turkey, Georgia, Italy, Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Serbia, Slovenia, Croatia and Northern Macedonia.
For household consumers in the EU – defined as medium-sized consumers with an annual consumption of between 20 – 200 Gigajoules (GJ), natural gas prices in the first half of 2024 were highest in Sweden, the Netherlands and Austria. They were lowest in Hungary, Croatia and Romania. The price of natural gas for households in Sweden was more than three times the price charged in Hungary (which was still receiving Russian piped gas at the time the figures were tallied) and 59% higher than the EU average price. This map shows the prices for household (non-industrial) gas across the EU.
Prices for British consumers is calculated in a different way, so a true like for like comparison is difficult, but the average gas bill for consumers, consuming around 11,200 kWh per annum, is estimated at £814, which roughly works out as €8.65 per 100kW. It should be noted that Britain still has some (albeit depleted) North Sea gas available and enjoys a direct pipeline connection to the Norwegian gas fields.
What Have Hamsters, Bicycles and Green Lifestyles Got in Common?
The answer is the UK’s Online Safety Act, which has just come into force. This badly drafted and overly vague act was inherited from the Sunak government and implemented in its entirety by the Starmer government. The stated purpose of the act was for protecting children and adults online by “allowing them to see only what they want to see,” which in plain English means “allowing them to see only what the government wants them to see”. The previous technology Secretary, Michelle Donelan, said the government was “empowering adults with more choices over what they see online”.
It attempts to do so by requiring that designated online service providers rigorously police content and activity related to 17 categories of harm, including terrorism, harassment, stalking, coercion, hate, intimate abuse images, and child sexual exploitation and abuse (CSEA), among others, on their websites, no matter how small the site itself is or what its reach is. Category one sites will also need to “proactively offer adult users optional tools, to help them reduce the likelihood that they will encounter certain types of legal content.”
As Ofcom, the regulatory body charged with implementing the law, explains, “The rules apply to organisations big and small, from large and well-resourced companies to very small ‘micro-businesses.’ They also apply to individuals who run an online service.”
The rules cover a variety of “user-to-user” services (i.e. any site that allows user comments or publicly accessible feedback) that serve the UK market in a significant way (which was not defined in either the act nor its guidance – its definition being at the whim of Ofcom, the UK’s ‘independent’ online censor), whether they’re inside or outside the country. This includes social media sites, photo and/or video sharing sites, chat, blogs, forums, instant messaging services, dating services, and gaming services. The rules also cover search services, although Britain appears to have no internet search companies of its own. Through this act, the UK government is attempting to regulate the whole of the internet.
Under the terms of the online safety act anyone who runs a website, anywhere in the world, that is accessible to people living in the UK, has to undertake a time-consuming and meticulously detailed audit of their site(s). They then have to create a full risk assessment and to put in place various mitigations (e.g. more effective content filtering technology – including image hash comparisons with a list maintained by Ofcom – and moderators and/or fact checkers) to deal with identified risks.
The form that this risk assessment should take appears not to have been defined either, but any individual site owner who doesn’t complete it to Ofcom’s satisfaction would be subject to a fine of up to £18 million ($22 million) or 10 percent of their global revenue, whichever is greater. There’s also the potential of criminal liability and prison for the designated site managers (who have to be named as part of the compliance procedure) who have ignored or not known about these obligations or failed to fulfil them to Ofcom’s satisfaction.
In order to ensure compliance, Ofcom has created an online regulation checker to help those operating web services understand whether they’re obligated to comply. On the site, it says that you should allow at least an hour to complete the form, which is a waste of time as it almost always says you need to comply if you run a site that allows user interaction.
According to Neil Brown, director of British law firm decoded legal, any website operator who allows a forbidden off-topic post to appear on their site could be liable, particularly as there are no clear directions as to what their obligation is.
“As with quite a lot of the Online Safety Act, even with Ofcom’s tomes of guidance, the answer to some of these most basic questions, particularly in the context of services provided by individuals, is, at this point at least, ‘sod knows,'” Brown said. He also said he intends to put this question directly to Ofcom, though he doesn’t expect a straight answer.
The Online Safety Act obligations came into force on March 17, 2025, and large website operators were already concerned. Several, like London Fixed Gear and Single Speed (a site devoted to cycling), have stated that they will shut their online forums rather than attempt to comply. And outside the UK, online discussion site Lobsters has implemented a geoblock that will prevent UK visitors from accessing the site after March 16. In addition, a site dedicated to the care of Hamsters and another for sustainable, green lifestyles, have been closed. It is estimated that 100s of sites have closed down or have blocked visitors from the UK, rather than trying to wade through the morass of compliance procedures and then being prosecuted for failing to take down a prohibited post fast enough (the rapidity of which is not defined either).
An example of a prohibited post is, “Presenting information—even factually accurate information—in a way that amounts to misrepresentation”. What does that even mean? For example, is saying that “The UK is currently in the middle of an economic crisis and the chancellor is making it worse” prohibited?
The problem is that nobody actually knows; because Ofcom, an unelected body run by an ex-TV magnate and an economist, has been mandated to draw up the rules and they haven’t. Which begs the question of where are the elected representatives in all this? Isn’t it their job to draw up a list of the rules? Moreover, these rules, if and when they come into being, can be changed at will by the Home Secretary on the advice of Ofcom. And the vagueness of the provisions in the act means that the whole communication ecosystem in the UK can be altered at the whim of a minister at some time in the future.
What Ofcom have produced is a report on Illegal content, Codes of Practice for user-to-user services. This document sets out the duties of anyone involved in the website (the provider) outlining their bureaucratic duties under the act. For example, one of their duties is:
The provider should have an internal monitoring and assurance function to provide independent assurance that measures taken to mitigate and manage the risks of harm to individuals identified in the risk assessment are effective on an ongoing basis.
The results of which would be provided to the site’s audit committee. Who would comprise that committee on, say, a website run by a Hamster enthusiast?
And it’s not just the onerous and ever-changing bureaucracy that will cause pause for any UK based or foreign website that may be accessed by a UK dweller, it is also the actual costs of compliance:
Section 84 Duty to pay fees: OFCOM may require a provider of a regulated service to pay a fee in respect of a charging year which is a fee-paying year. The fee is based on the provider’s qualifying worldwide revenue for the qualifying period relating to that charging year, and any other factors that OFCOM considers appropriate and made in the manner that OFCOM considers appropriate.
So, they can charge whatever they like and the hapless website owner has to pay.
In addition, companies that supply services to people using the internet should withdraw their service from a named individual or company when it’s suggested by Ofcom. They even supplied a list of the type companies or services to which these suggestions would be aimed:
- Internet Service Providers and Mobile Network Operators
- Content Distribution Networks
- Anonymizing services (VPNs, proxies)
- Domain Name registration services (registry and registrar)
- Auxiliary services (e.g. payments, certification authorities)
- Advertising networks
- Web hosting
- Browsers
- App stores
- Device operating systems
- Cloud storage
In other words, Ofcom want VPNs, apps, browsers, web hosting and operating systems worldwide essentially under their control. But, of course, it’s only voluntary and it only applies to services related to transferring child abuse images.
At least at the moment.
One of the 17 prohibited items outlined in the act is “Foreign Interference”. As to what this interference amounts to, Ofcom undertook a ‘study’, which it presented for our enlightenment in the form of a turgid and heavy going report, which basically says that foreign news sites present information differently to UK based news outlets (which are under the control of the DSMA), so they must be banned.
The act is not without its levity though.
For example, consider Section 1, subsection 3(ii) of the act, which says that sites must ensure that: “users’ rights to freedom of expression and privacy are protected”. How will this be done and what the penalties are for not doing it, we were not told. This is concerning as the Electronic Frontier Foundation said the act will lead to a further erosion in UK citizen’s freedom of expression rather than having them protected.
What actually constitutes the right to free expression (aka freedom of speech) in the UK? According to the law (and Tony Blair), the Human Rights Act provides the over-arching definition:
Note that subsection 2 effectively nullifies subsection 1. So, it could have been more simply put as “Everyone has the right to say exactly what the government allows them to say.” The Human Rights Act, unlike the US Constitution and Bill of Rights, appears to be designed to protect the government from the people, rather than the other way around.
How does this UK ‘freedom of speech’ as enshrined in the HRA, operate in practice? Take this case, where a small group of Quaker women were discussing Gaza and climate change in their house of worship. Twenty police officers, some of whom were armed with Tasers, smashed open the door and arrested the six women apparently stating that they were in breach of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 and the Public Order Act 2023 as they were thought to be planning a protest..
As the article says “… changes in judicial procedures limit protesters’ ability to defend their actions in court. All this means that there are fewer and fewer ways to speak truth to power.” It goes on to say: “Quakers support the right to nonviolent public protest, acting themselves from a deep moral imperative to stand up against injustice and for our planet.”
This seems to be part of a pattern of restricting freedom of speech for Christians, like in Aldershot and Farnborough where the local Labour led council (the same party as the government) has banned Christians from telling people the good news or even in giving passers-by Bible tracts. Despite this being a part of British culture for centuries.
You can read a legal case study and commentary on the Act here.
You can find a very enlightening video regarding the Act and the general degradation of the British legal system by a legal expert here. It is worth watching as it highlights the growing trend of ‘two tier justice’, where certain categories of people are treated more leniently based on things such as race, religion or sexual orientation.
This has led to the Prime Minister being dubbed ‘Two-tier Keir’. During the discussion, mention was made of sentencing guidelines where certain types of offenders are to have their cases be subject to a pre-sentence report to find reasons to have their sentences reduced or be subject to community service instead of jail, while others have no such privileges. The pertinent part of the report is shown below and the whole thing can be read here.
STOP PRESS: Keir Starmer has expressed his opposition to the sentencing guidelines but laments that the sentencing council won’t change them even though he asked them to: “Look, I’m disappointed in this response, and the lord chancellor is obviously continuing to engage on this, and we’re considering our response. All options are on the table. I’m disappointed at this outcome, and now we will have to consider what we do as a result.” When asked if the government intended to introduce legislation regarding it he said: “all options were on the table and that Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary [and the person in charge of appointing the members of the council], has described the current guidelines as unacceptable”.
France Sends a Survival Manual to all of its Citizens
That’s very nice of them, but why?
Note: this guide would not be applicable in the UK as knives are banned.
And France isn’t the only place ramping up the FUD.
Preparedness. Not just for the EU. In my home state of Oregon there is a push for everyone to be “2 weeks ready” – https://www.oregon.gov/oem/hazardsprep/pages/2-weeks-ready.aspx
Driven in part by the Cascadia subduction threat. In real terms this means that if anything bad happens you’re on your own and local mutual aid is your only real fall back. Get to know your neighbors because in this day and age governmental aid isn’t coming. Recent examples in Hawaii, South Carolina, and L.A. all bear this out.
Other examples are Hurricane Sandy and Texas cold snap. Be prepared to handle several days without power, water, and food.
For wildfires, tsunamis, and some other disasters, a to-go bag is something to be included.
Don’t forget the Pandemic when Biden said that it was all over and people were now on their own. if another Pandemic rocks up you can expect the same for this one as well. And if you get sick it is all on you but not to worry. Big Pharma will be sure to come up with a recklessly dangerous vaccine that will cost a mint and will be mandatory if you want to leave your house to get food.
Due to a complete misunderstanding, the Trump administration has banned trans fats…
You suggest that “The Human Rights Act, unlike the US Constitution and Bill of Rights, appears to be designed to protect the government from the people, rather than the other way around.”
Um, no. The HRA was the long overdue incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law, and essentially repeats what the ECHR says. For example Article 10 of the ECHR, Section 2, dealing with freedom of expression says:
“The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.”
In other words your extract is a copy and paste from the ECHR, which is normal with implementing legislation of this kind. Anyone who has a quarrel with these exceptions is about 75 years too late.
Will you weigh in on Le Pen?
Someone made the point Lagarde (almost) got into trouble for something similar.
Taibbi/Kirn on ATW just this moment call Le Pen a former Socialist, which to me is absurd.
Of course there is the case of innocent until proven otherwise.
Which nobody really seems to care about.
Taibbi/Kirn argue the case should be a strong one because here we have a potential President.
Well that would however contradict equal treatment of all citizens by courts.
The only German paper that I trust, Junge Welt, calls the judges upright and fearless – still to me this is all a bit odd.
Not to mention Romania.
p.s. As to Bardella – perhaps this will turn out a blessing for the party
This morning there is an opinion piece out in Mediapart by Fabrice Arfi. Mediapart broke this embezzlement scandal 12 years ago…Mediapart has its problems, but they are one of the few organizations doing real investigative journalism in France. The corrupt and vulgar Sarkozy is on trial currently because of them.
A few things to share from the paywalled article :
– From outside of France, this might look more arbitrary than it does here : it is a regular practice here for judges to (usually temporarily) ban people from a profession when they are convicted of crimes. He gives a list of examples, entrepreneurs are banned for VAT fraud, a business owner for off-the-books workers, prison guard for violence, anesthetist for stealing medicine etc. I have to say when I first moved here many years ago, I was glad to see embezzling politicians being forced to sit out the next round. When a socialist minister (Cahuzac) got caught for tax fraud, Mme Le Pen spoke out for lifetime bans for immoral/corrupt politicians.
– The article cites from the judge’s long post-judgment discourse :
*She reminds about the gravity of the affair and the systematic nature of the embezzlement… facts that risk to be lost in all the noise about her being a presidential candidate. 4 millions euros embezzled over 12 years.
*Talking about that fact that the ineligibility to hold office was effective immediately, she talked about the risk of recidivism : Le Pen and her team spent their time in the investigation and trial (like Sarkozy is doing in his) demagogically denying the most basic evidence and denigrating judicial authority.
For Mr. Arfi and the judge what is at stake here is the principle of equality before the law.
The judge : “The defense’s proposal to allow the sovereign people to decide on a hypothetical sanction at the ballot box is to claim a privilege or immunity based on one’s status of being elected or a candidate… in violation of the principle of equality before the law.”
Afri “(In the onslaught of denunciations of her conviction we are seeing…) a desire to return privileges which were abolished on the night of August 1789.”
As for trying to find hidden socialist impulses in Mme Le Pen…it’s horseshit.
Thank you for taking the time.
As to German media: I am surprised then this case was treated with so much negligence considering the ever voiced fears of fascism all over.
Same goes for AfD´s Alice Weidel´s same-sex relationship. While I think it is nobody´s business, it is, once a party attempts to building an electorial victory on denouncing such relationships or at least regard them as odd enough to single them out instead of possibly embracing them in whatever form (“woke”?).
Is it possible that in Germany such a case as Le Pen´s would effectively end any politicians career?
On the other hand anyone who is in the position to get his or her hands on such huge amounts is not be taken seriously anyhow.
Lets hope Taibbi/Kirn will have someone inform them about the case.
p.s.
German alternative news site NACHDENKSEITEN critical of the verdict, argueing the French judicial system acts quicker in case of politicians opposed to the ruling mainstream.
Marine Le Pen and the double standards
https://archive.is/8OPbk
It mainly refers to German EMP Martin Sonneborn who posted on TWITTER, pointing out the double standard.
The German-language TWITTER-text by Sonneborn would be here:
To put the text into a translator use c&p
https://x.com/MartinSonneborn/status/1858464178530357476
It is longer with 2700 words.
The comparison with Lagarde was here in BERLINER ZEITUNG:
German-language
https://archive.is/20ZFq
“(…)The background was that in 2008, Lagarde, as Finance Minister, had approved and released a compensation payment of €400 million, financed by French taxpayers, to the French entrepreneur Bernard Tapie as compensation for heavy losses from the sale of Adidas shares many years earlier. And, the court ruled, this was apparently unlawful.
Lagarde was convicted for negligently allowing third parties to embezzle state funds. The court showed leniency in this regard. Christine Lagarde never received a penalty. Was she a hardship case? The matter only came to light because the sum of €400 million had provoked outrage among the French public.
(…)
At the time of the verdict in 2016, it was said that the incident had damaged Lagarde’s credibility. Which didn’t stop anyone from appointing her as President of the European Central Bank less than three years later. Without shackles, suspended sentences, or the loss of any voting rights.
(…)”
Dare I suggest that the post of Administrative Assistant to the Director Ofcom would be a perfect post for our old friend and advisor Sir Humphrey Appleby.
The “real” UK government is looking like a real-world version of Yes Minister.
As China found out with the “Gang of Four” and America found out with Reagan, beware of having actors in high places.
There’s no need the current CEO is a female Humphrey Abbleby – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melanie_Dawes – look at that career path
I was thinking that “The Dark Enlightenment” our Broligarchs want is too lengthy a term and too vague as well.
“The Crapture” seems more apt, the total enshittification of everything.
Ole T. Gabbard in full-on flattery mode, buttering up that imbecile Trump. Was it really only 4-5 years ago when Genocide Joe was getting the butter? It’s all part of her journey to the Presidency, but she’s clearly not a deep thinker. Her fanboys are likely having a tough time with her fawning, but they should’ve seen this coming. They were warned.
yeah. that is disappointing,lol.
i still havent decided if i pay attention to her for her throughts, etc…or for her looks(and that voice(amfortas swoons)).
(“im comfortable with my mansmell”—from Weeds)
regardless of my motivations,lol, i dont trust anyone in that cohort, writ large.
r or d.
all full o shite…which seems to be requirement for entry.
i remain unrepresented.
‘DNI Tulsi Gabbard
@DNIGabbard
President Trump IS the President of Peace. He is ending bloodshed across the world and will deliver lasting peace in the Middle East.
Where Joe Biden failed, President Trump will succeed.’
https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/1905968207061492064
As the US bombed Yemen 65 times in 24 hours.
Gabbard has been assimilated.
yeah. i guess Ron Paul, who got my first vote for presnit on an antiwar stance, is likely the only Pol i still have any respect for.
Masse, maybe.
and both of those guys are on the Right.
aint nobody on the Left anymore.
american politics is pretty much over, for me, for the foreseeable future.
Or maybe she had been a plant all along, and this is the Deep State’s way of bringing her in from the cold.
I’ve already said this before, but politicians come and go but the swamp is eternal. One or two months from now, some new hot politician will burst into the scene delivering the eerily familiar spiel of hope and change, and people will fall for that …. again. What’s that saying: fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.
There’s only one way to fix clusterf***: a huge Yellowstone explosion. The rest are nothing but theater. The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of muppets and tyrants.
She did a spectacular 180, left AOC in the dust.
Is it too early to call her GG, as Genocide Gabbard?
I am glad she was not nominated. I would have wasted my vote for her anti-war smoke-screen.
If she continues on this path,
Then yeah “anti war smokescreen” just about sums it up.
We can confirm that she is smarter than Annalena Baerbock, because she did 180°, and not 360°.
Makes me think GaBORG instead of Gabbard. Thanks Rev
Unrelated to anything but did anyone notice the search for MH370 is back on? Very interesting developments, including the pilot possibly flying to a rendezvous point with a ship. It rather smells like a state actor to me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIuXEU4H-XE
Reading through this post the feeling seems to be one of panic among the elites hence the crackdowns. Globalism is dying a quick death, regionalism is coming back with a vengeance. the “international rules-based order” is being destroyed by the Russian army (that was never on my bingo card) and everything is up for grabs. Trump as President is acting as an accelerate for all these of course. So what do the elites do? Crack down but hard by arresting opponents, barring the ‘wrong” sort of candidates from standing for office, restricting the internet to being only an advertising board, distracting the population with war scars so that they can force through slush funds for ‘defense’ from which many a beak will dip into it. What a time to be alive. Our own governments are turning on us big time in order to protect those elites from the consequences of their actions.
Yuuuup.
Keep calm and keep organizing and never give into the emotional Charybdis they’ve unleashed!
sorry if this has been linked…its my busiest time of year…and cousin and his millionaire girlfriend(!) are movin way out here and buying land and wanting to be developers of fair priced housing, etc(lol)…and im the local Fixer, hooking them up with my county commish buddy, and such.
as well as the BnB not having a grill…so they sure as hell aint on my schedule(up at 4am, bed by 8pm), in the least.
anyhooo:https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2025/02/overextended-the-european-disunion-at-a-crossroads/
wolfgang streek
Worth noting that the French survival kit mentions that people should get cash, because obviously ATMs will be out of order in such an emergency.
Not sure what money would still be good for when the nukes fly, but anything that helps people keep cash afloat is welcome.
Of course, all that EU panic is rank amateurism; Switzerland had guidelines about rationing and survival stocks since the Cold War heyday and, as far as I know, they weren’t really repelled or abandoned, though probably are not strictly enforced anymore when it comes to the general population. And considering its a country which, just like UK, imports half its food, I bet they didn’t plan to last for just 3 days.
They all get issued with a gun too.
The guidelines are revised from time to time and can be found here.
There is even an official calculator. You can decide how long you want to be able to hold. The results are quite detailed.
During early parts of the Covid Pandemic, France ran out of Dijon Mustard because the seeds are mostly imported from Canada.
Dijon Mustard.
I hope the next popular movement is “les Sacs à Dos” making fun of this warmongering like the Gilets Jaunes did with the obligatory safety vests.
The Trump admin is telling Starmer that there will be no free trade with the UK without free speech. I know it’s the Daily Mail but…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14556995/British-pro-life-free-speech-row-Trump-free-trade.html
and yet the amurkin thought police will come for me if i dare to say bad things about israel.
do any of these people even hear themselves?
i painted, rather discretely, “thought criminal” on the lil headache rack on my truck…in a drunken fit of pique, some time ago.
in before-times, this would have been commented on…at least at the feedstore.
nowadays, i guess everyone understands,lol…because no one has said a word.
The Trump admin is telling so many things that even the yellow press can’t keep up.
Do those legislative exertions by the UK mean that NakedCapitalism is also theoretically subject to those intrusive regulations from the Online Safety Act?
I suspect this is the primary intended purpose of the bill. Legally close off the old, homegrown or hobbyist internet sites, leaving only room for a small number of large megacorp run sites, who have the resources to spend on internal censorship offices, which are then at the disposal of governments. Western governments have gotten a taste of an internet at their beck and whim and don’t want to lose it. They prefer to lose the internet in fact.
This UK regulation is “throwing a spanner in the works” you might say. I am a volunteer for a free and open source software project that is branded as “Kodi”, though for historical reasons the foundation set up to oversee it is called XBMC. We provide an online wiki and support forum (that I guess is physically located in the UK) to provide user support. Like one volunteer maintains the site, and two or three provide moderation for the forum and wiki edits. We don’t have any capacity to do the stuff Ofcom wants. Not sure what the plan is; don’t think we are in compliance today.