Forgive me for critiquing two Wall Street Journal articles in one evening, but the worst offender (this one) caught my eye second. It’s frustrating because this page one story, “U.S. Investors Face An Age of Murky Pricing,” attempts to explain the role of transparency, or more accurately, the lack thereof, in the recent credit market […]
Read more...The problem with being public is that your dirty underwear gets exposed, and if you are an investment bank, that means you have to talk about embarrassing losses. Morgan Stanley announced that it lost $390 million in a single day in August. And of course, it was those pesky quant traders. And even worse, Morgan […]
Read more...I am kicking myself that I didn’t come up with the proposal made by Brandeis professor Stephen Cecchetti in today’s Financial Times. His opinion piece, “A better way to organise securities markets,” is the single best idea for securities reform I have seen in a very long time. It is simple, elegant, and addresses many […]
Read more...Paul Kedrosky (of Infectious Greed fame) points to a a terrific paper by Amir E. Khandaniy and Andrew W. Lo of MIT, “What Happened to the Quants in August 2007?”. I’ll confess that I have only skimmed it, but it looks thoughtful, has all the right caveats (the researchers admit they may not have and […]
Read more...The Wall Street Journal has broken the story that UBS will announce that it is writing down its fixed income book as much as 4 billion Swiss Francs, or roughly $3.4 billion, which will result in losses of 600 to 700 million SFr for its third quarter. Although this write-off is greater than those taken […]
Read more...John Dizard of the Financial Times looks at the role of financial models in the recent market perturbations and argues that most observers are making the problem seem more complicated than it actually is. First, some firms had systems that were designed unduly for the convenience of the traders, and it proved way too easy […]
Read more...In an intriguing article today, “The Bank loses a game of chicken,” Martin Wolf, the Financial Times’ chief economics writer, followed the lead of the Bank of England’s Governor Mervyn King in backing down from their shared view that central bankers should be willing to let all but those banks “too big to fail” go […]
Read more...Readers have probably figured out that I think the reporting in the Wall Street Journal is overrated. We have a prime example on page one today, “How Market Turmoil Waylaid the ‘Quants’.” My understanding is that newspapers are in the business of providing news. The story that the quants are in trouble is a month […]
Read more...John Dizard, in today’s Financial Times, tells us why, despite the fact that a lot of fixed income paper is on offer at very cheap prices, no one seems to be stepping to the plate. And his explanation bodes ill for things turning around very soon. The simple story is that even though the buys […]
Read more...The Fed’s move on Friday to lower discount rates and its policy shift towards addressing risks to growth has not brought relief to the sector that was in the most distress, the money markets. Panicked action continued Monday, begging the question of what, if anything, the authorities can do. Institutional are fleeing from counterparty risk […]
Read more...A gut-wrenching two weeks in the credit markets have been capped by unprecedented moves by central bankers. The ECB’s offer of an unlimited infusion to member banks the week before last was followed last Friday’ by the Fed’s discount rate cut, which included stern warnings that those who needed it better use it and a […]
Read more...A Bloomberg story, in what may be becoming conventional wisdom, charges Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke with making a novice’s error: By lowering the discount rate and issuing a statement conceding threats to the economy, Federal Open Market Committee members effectively ripped up the economic-outlook statement from their Aug. 7 meeting. Some economists describe the […]
Read more...Gillian Tett, in “Credit compass fails to work,” in the Financial Times, uses the woes suffered by monoline insurers such as MBIA and Ambac to illustrate that in our current subprime/housing credit crisis, nobody is sure where the dead bodies lie, which makes everyone suspect. Monoline insurers provide credit guarantees for securities. They have come […]
Read more...It’s summer rerun time. By happenstance, I came across a May post, which referred to a Federal Reserve study that had found that risks of hedge funds pursuing highly correlated strategies appeared, by some measures, as high as before the LTCM crisis. We had thought the Fed might be making a mistake in dismissing its […]
Read more...Even though the Fed cut the discount rate to 5.75%, and more important, said it was concerned about risks to growth, asset backed commercial paper, which is the epicenter of the credit shock, is being placed at newly high yields: 5.99%, which is now above the discount rate. And remember, not only has the Fed […]
Read more...