Yves here. As much as relieving patients of medical debt seems like a noble goal, critics have a point that buying debt to retire it has the effect of keeping a predatory system going. One tell is in the story below: “About half the debts [purchased] are also more than seven years old.”
These medical debts are governed by state law. As the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau points out:
Most states or jurisdictions have statutes of limitations between three and six years for debts, but some may be longer. This may also vary depending, for instance, on the:
- Type of debt
- State where you live
- State law named in your credit agreement
So more than half these debts were almost certainly legally invalid. Yet this charity found it more efficient to buy off grifters trying to collect these bogus obligations rather than help victims contest the charges.
The article handwaves that nothing can be done at the state or local level to stop these abuses. I beg to differ. The issue is a lack of will and not a lack of means. For instance, medical facilities and facilities should face loss of their licenses if they persist in attempting to collect on invalid charges. A less draconian measure would be punitive damages and reimbursement of legal fees for successfully contesting medical debt collection.
By Noam N. Levey. Originally published at KFF Health News
Underscoring the massive scale of America’s medical debt problem, a New York-based nonprofit has struck a deal to pay off old medical bills for an estimated 20 million people.
Undue Medical Debt, which buys patient debt, is retiring $30 billion worth of unpaid bills in a single transaction with Pendrick Capital Partners, a Virginia-based debt trading company. The average patient debt being retired is $1,100, according to the nonprofit, with some reaching the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
The deal will prevent the debt being sold and protect millions of people from being targeted by collectors. But even proponents of retiring patient debt acknowledge that these deals cannot solve a crisis that now touches around 100 million people in the U.S.
“We don’t think that the way we finance health care is sustainable,” Undue Medical Debt chief executive Allison Sesso said in an interview with KFF Health News. “Medical debt has unreasonable expectations,” she said. “The people who owe the debts can’t pay.”
In the past year alone, Americans borrowed an estimated $74 billion to pay for health care, a nationwide West Health-Gallup survey found. And even those who benefit from Undue’s debt relief may have other medical debt that won’t be relieved.
This large purchase also highlights the challenges that debt collectors, hospitals, and other health care providers face as patients rack up big bills that aren’t covered by their health insurance.
Pendrick’s chief executive, Chris Eastman, declined several requests to be interviewed about the debt sale, which has not been previously reported. But Eastman acknowledged in a 2024 podcast episode that collecting medical debts has grown more challenging as regulators have restricted how collectors can pursue patients.
Pendrick has now shuttered, which Sesso said provided strong motivation for this deal. “This was a really great opportunity to get a debt buyer out of the market,” she said.
Undue Medical Debt pioneered its debt relief strategy a decade ago, leveraging charitable donations to buy medical debt from debt trading companies at steeply discounted prices and then freeing patients from the obligation to pay.
The nonprofit now buys debts directly from hospitals, as well. And it is working with about two dozen state and local governments to leverage public money to relieve medical debt in communities from Los Angeles County to Cleveland to the state of Connecticut.
The approach has been controversial. And Undue Medical Debt’s record-setting purchase — financed by a mix of philanthropy and taxpayer dollars — is likely to stoke more debate over the value of paying collectors for medical debts.
“The approach is just treating the symptoms and not the disease,” said Elisabeth Benjamin, a vice president at the Community Service Society of New York, a nonprofit that has led efforts to restrict aggressive hospital collections. Benjamin and other advocates say systemic changes such as ensuring hospitals offer sufficient financial aid to patients and reining in high medical prices would be more valuable in preventing people from sinking into debt.
But many government officials see retiring people’s unpaid medical bills as part of a larger strategy to make it easier for patients to avoid debt in the first place.
“Turning off the tap is what’s really important in the long run,” said Naman Shah, a physician who directs medical affairs at the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. The county is working to improve local hospital financial aid programs for patients. But Shah said debt relief is key, as well.
“It’s easy to criticize band-aids when you’re not the one who’s cut,” he said. “As a physician, I take care of people who have cuts, and I know the importance of stitching them back up.”
Undue Medical Debt’s latest deal, which it is spending $36 million to close, will help patients nationwide, according to the nonprofit. But about half the estimated 20 million people whose debts Pendrick owned live in just two states: Texas or Florida.
Neither has expanded Medicaid coverage through the 2010 Affordable Care Act, a key tool that researchers have foundbolsters patients’ financial security by protecting them from big medical bills and debt.
The patients eligible for debt relief have incomes at or below four times the federal poverty level, about $63,000 for a single person, or debts that exceed 5% of their incomes.
About half the debts are also more than seven years old. These have been donated to Undue Medical Debt by Pendrick, the group reported.
The nonprofit plans to pay for the rest of the debts over the next year and a half, though all collections have stopped against patients. It also plans to spend an additional $40 million — or $2 a person — to process the debts, find patients, and inform them that their debts have been relieved.
Sesso, Undue’s chief executive, said she hopes the debt purchase will keep policymakers focused on enacting longer-term solutions to the nation’s medical debt crisis.
She applauded state leaders for taking steps to bar medical debts from their residents’ credit scores. But she said action is also needed in Washington, D.C. However, the Trump administration has suspended regulations enacted underformer President Joe Biden that would have barred credit reporting of medical debt nationally, and congressional Republicans are now moving to revoke the new rules.
“There is a limit to what state and local governments can do to solve this problem,” Sesso said. “It’s really a national problem that has to be solved at the national level.”
The State of Vermont has a proposal on this subject.
https://www.vermonttreasurer.gov/medical-debt-relief-proposal#:~:text=Treasurer Mike Pieciak has announced,medical debt to credit agencies.
«…half the estimated 20 million people whose debts Pendrick owned live in just two states: Texas or Florida.
…
About half the debts are also more than seven years old. These have been donated to Undue Medical Debt by Pendrick, the group reported.»
The statute of limitations on medical debt is four years in Texas and five years in Florida. There were no ready answers in the embedded links, so the cynic in me has to ask:
How much of a tax write-off does the Pendrick collection agency get on its ‘donated’ debt? (or how much did MacKenzie Scott get when she donated $50M?) What’s the basis? The original debt? Or what Pendrick paid for it? How is expired debt discounted?
Of course, without a functioning IRS, these questions may be moot…
The article brings to mind the related issue of the requirements of nonprofit hospitals to provide “community benefits” to maintain nonprofit status. Traditionally low income, “charity” care was synonymous with community benefit. What now constitutes community benefit is elastic. It appears that some nonprofits are abusing their exemptions. There is a literature, some academic and some advocacy foundation such as the Lown Foundation dealing with how the benefit is being used.
“some nonprofits are abusing their exemptions”
I have some experience with this when I had a bike accident–not too serious but a trip to the emergency room–back before I was on Medicare. The non profit hospitals are supposed to offer substantial discounts to those not using insurance in exchange for the considerable local tax benefits they receive via their alleged non profit status. In other words the nominal–and of course unreasonable–charges are just a negotiating position although not quite on the level of a Trump style negotiation where your choice is to agree or be bombed.
And so I was able to cut the bill by about half but only by paying as I left the hospital after my overnight stay. There was still the matter of negotiating discounts with a few of the doctors.
The system is bizarre and convoluted and I’d say exhibit A when it comes to what’s wrong with this country. Of course I already knew that–having taken care of an aging mother with her various trips to the hospital–and I readily had the money to pay. But for those on the edge and financially less prepared it is undoubtedly a nightmare and an invisible nightmare to most of our politicians and policy overlords.
Adam Schiff speaks to this with a story of a guy who came up to him in the ObamaCare days – notwithstanding the horrors of that inefficient solution – where the schmo was given a litany of reasons that having health care is good, he said, “If they can’t afford it, they shouldn’t have it.”
(4 minutes in at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjOZUioGfs
There are so many reasons why the health care system in France is many times better and costs many times less than the US system. But that attitude is the key. A better education system would have the same condescending privledged reaction, but would also provide doctors and other medical service people who wouldn’t need to jack up prices to pay their school debt. …or get into equipment purchasing gangs who then need to divert patients to get the tests to pay the equipment that pays off their debts, etc. The French system is run by an organization composed of Management and Union Reps that constantly add to the system – so that all companies have the same level playing field instead of the US’s system where big business can write-off medical insurance for employees and small businesses can’t (in many situations). The costs for the ‘top up’ insurance that covers what the state system doesn’t cover is far more reasonable than …well, in our case, two months of the Part B withdrawl from Social Security pays for our yearly top up which also covers most dental and eye care.
I’m betting Trump’s puppetteers were afraid that the universities and science funding was going to discover an antidote for the GreedyBastard Syndrome Virus.
My experience has been that what they come after you for is just cream on top. Recent example, the insurer paid the hospital system $12000. Then the hospital shakes me down for even more cash on top of that.
I don’t owe them a dime. They have already been paid 2x what the services are worth by the insurer.
It’s a literal racket. The “debt” is totally fake. In fact it’s just another tax write off for them. It’s in their interest to not collect, so they can sell it, and also write it off on their taxes. You paying is actually the worst case scenario for them financially.
If they would just make medical debt not reportable to the credit bureaus the problem would solve itself imo